In Yogesh Kumar Garg v. Union Of India And Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 301
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW)
WRIT TAX No. - 81 of 2022
Yogesh Kumar Garg
.....Petitioner
v/s
Union of India and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Manish Misra, Advocate for respondents no. 2 and 3
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
1. None appeared for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the Department submitted that the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest in the petition and it is probably for this reason, none is present to press it. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Lucknow23.09.2022Manish Himwan/P.Sri.
(Rajnish Kumar)
Judge
(Rajesh Bindal) Chief Justice
Whether the order is speaking : NoWhether the order is reportable : Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue