Young Indian v. Assistant Commissioner Of
High Court
12 May 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Young Indian v. Assistant Commissioner Of
Date of order
12 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Young Indian v. Assistant Commissioner Of, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~13.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4087/2017
YOUNG INDIAN
..... Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Advocate along with Dr. Saif Mahmood, Mr. Sumant De, Mr. Amit Bhandari, Advocates
Through:
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX (E) & ANR.
..... Respondents Mehta, Additional
Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R12.05.2017
%
CM No. 17944 of 2017 (for exemption)
1. Allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 4087/2017 & CM No. 17942 of 2017 (for stay) & CM No. 17943of 2017 (for permission to file long synopsis) and CM No.18108/2017 (for placing on record correct documents)
2. Dr. A. M. Singhvi, learned Senior counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this petition by stating that the Petitioner reserves liberty to urge before the Assessing Officer (AO) all pleas available to the Petitioner including questioning the conclusion of the W.P.(C) 4087/2017 Page 1 of 2
AO that there are reasons to believe that income for the relevant Assessment
Year escaped assessment.
3. In view of the above statement, and expressing no opinion on merits, the Court dismisses the writ petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. The AO will consider all pleas of the Petitioner on merits in accordance with law. The applications are disposed of.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 12, 2017 b
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
W.P.(C) 4087/2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.