Youth Development Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1, Kolhapur
High Court
10 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Youth Development Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1, Kolhapur
Date of order
10 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Youth Development Co-Op Bank Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1, Kolhapur, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
(3)-ITXA-7-16.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016
Youth Development Co-op Bank Ltd. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle 1, Kolhapur
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar, Advocate for the Petitioner.Mr. N. C. Mohanty, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 10[th] MARCH, 2021
P.C.
Heard Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar, learned counsel for the appellantand Mr. N. C. Mohanty, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantunder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated29.10.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Punein ITA No.2162/PN/2013 for the assessment year 2009-10.
3. The appeal was admitted by this Court by order dated18.06.2018 on the substantial question of law framed in the said order.
4. Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant.
BGP.
1 of 2
Digitallysigned byBalajiG.PanchalBalaji G.PanchalDate:2021.03.1016:28:36+0530
(3)-ITXA-7-16.doc.
5. It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. Interms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 before thedesignated authority. Designated authority has issued certificate undersection 5(1) on 31.12.2020 determining the amount payable. For passingof the final order under section 5(2), appellant is required to withdraw theappeal under section 4(3) and to furnish proof of withdrawal along withintimation of payment, if any, to the designated authority. Hence, prayerfor withdrawal of the appeal.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made.
7. Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal.
8. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
9.
Refund as per rules.
MILIND N. JADHAV, J
UJJAL BHUYAN, J
BGP.
2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.