Case LawHigh Court › Zafar Alam Shaharyar, Director Of M/S. V...

Zafar Alam Shaharyar, Director Of M/S. Vaibhavlazmi Commodities Private Limited v. Ct

High Court 08 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Zafar Alam Shaharyar, Director Of M/S. Vaibhavlazmi Commodities Private Limited v. Ct
Date of order
08 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Zafar Alam Shaharyar, Director Of M/S. Vaibhavlazmi Commodities Private Limited v. Ct, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 271 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: Accordingly this writ petition being WPA 59 of 2024 is disposed of. [SECTION] ## (Md.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

WPA 59 OF 2024 08.01.2024 Sl no. 16 Zafar Alam Shaharyar, Director of M/s. Vaibhavlazmi Commodities Private Limited - Vs - Ct no. 2 P.M. Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 13(1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumdar, Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Ms. Alisha Das, Mr. Samrat Das, Ms. Elina Dey ... for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Kundalia … for the respondent Income Tax Authorities Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 30[th] November, 2023, under Section 271(1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice and non application of mind, by contending that in the aforesaid impugned order it has been recorded that no response has been given by the petitioner or received by the department against the notice dated 27[th] October, 2023 which petitioner has given its response by letter dated 31[st] October, 2023 being annexure P/19 to the writ petition. Without going into the merit of the aforesaid impugned penalty order, on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice and non application of mind alone, the aforesaid impugned order dated 30[th] November, 2023 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer concerned to pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or its authorised representatives and by taking into consideration the aforesaid reply of the petitioner dated 31[st] October, 2023, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. In course of hearing before the Assessing Officer, petitioner shall be at liberty to take all the points raised in this writ petition. Accordingly this writ petition being WPA 59 of 2024 is disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan