In Zaffar Iqbal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
ITA No. 49 of 2013
Zaffar Iqbal
…..Appellant
Through: None.
Vs
Income Tax Officer
.…. Respondents
Through: Mr. Pariksha Parmar, Adv.
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant for the last three consecutive dates of hearings. Same is the position today also, which suggests that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the present appeal.
The present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) (TASHI RABSTAN) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE (A)
Jammu 02.02.2023 Paramjeet
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.