Zakaulla Siddiqui v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

(22)-ITXA-2661-18.doc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2661 OF 2018 Zakaulla Siddiqui Versus ..Appellant Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. A. R. Singh, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 22[nd ]FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C. Heard Mr. A. R. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Sham Walve, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantunder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated26.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” Bench,Mumbai in ITA No.304/Mum/2015 for the assessment year 2011-12. 3. The appeal is pending for admission. 4. Today the appeal is before us on praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant. 5. It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. In BGP. 1 of 2 Balaji G.Panchal Digitally signed byBalaji G. PanchalDate: 2021.02.2313:40:07 +0530 (22)-ITXA-2661-18.doc. terms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 before thedesignated authority. Designated authority issued certificate under section5(1) on 11.01.2021 determining the amount payable. For passing of thefinal order under section 5(2), appellant is required to withdraw the appealunder section 4(3) and to furnish proof of withdrawal along withintimation of payment, if any, to the designated authority. Hence, prayerfor withdrawal of the appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to theprayer made. 7. Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal. 8. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 9. Refund as per rules. MILIND N. JADHAV, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J 2 of 2