Zohar Lokhandwala v. The Asstt.cit
High Court
28 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Zohar Lokhandwala v. The Asstt.cit
Date of order
28 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Zohar Lokhandwala v. The Asstt.cit, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.37 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.37 OF 2004
Zohar Lokhandwala .. Appellant
Vs.
The Asstt.CIT .. Respondent
Mr.K.Shivaram i/by Mr.K.Gopal for the Appellant.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 28th July, 2008
DATE : 28th July, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.Shivram, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks
leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as
per the Rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue