Case LawHigh Court › Zscaler, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of I...

Zscaler, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1)(1), International Tax & Ors

High Court 22 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Zscaler, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1)(1), International Tax & Ors
Date of order
22 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2023-24
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Zscaler, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1)(1), International Tax & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13536/2024 ZSCALER, INC. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kishore Kumal, Ms. Ankita Prakash & Mr. Jayesh Sitlani, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAX & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya, JSC, Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSC and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Counsel with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya, JSC, Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSC and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R% 22.10.2024 1.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter-alia, praying as under: “(a) issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions of like nature directing the Respondents to grant statutory interest to the Petitioner on the credited refund for AY 2023-24 for the period between December 2023 to 26.04.2024, in accordance with Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 along with applicable interest; and (b) for such further and other reliefs, including costs of this Petition, as this Hon‟ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case.” 2.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states, on instructions, that an appropriate order for grant of refund, as sought by the petitioner herein, would be passed within a period of one week from date. 3.In view of the above statement, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition, except to note that the respondents shall be bound by the statement made on their behalf today. 4.The petition is disposed of. 5.Needless to state, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the concerned officer, all its rights and remedies are reserved. VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 22, 2024/at SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan