Amalie Management Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
25 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Amalie Management Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
25 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Amalie Management Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
25.07.2023PBSl. No.5.
WPA 16324 of 2023
Amalie Management Pvt. Ltd. VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward 1(1),Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Kausheyo Roy,Mr. Samrat Das. … For the Petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De.……..for the Parishad.
Heard learned advocates appearing for theparties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challengedthe impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, dated 25[th] April, 2023, relatingto the assessment year 2019-20 and subsequentproceeding on the ground that the same is bad in lawfor the reason that the aforesaid order has beenpassed against a non-existing entity/noticee which byvirtue of amalgamation has merged with another entityand this fact was duly informed by the petitioner on18[th] April, 2023, which is the date prior to the date ofpassing the impugned order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Act. Petitioner submits that in spite of such
information about the non-existing of noticee, theaforesaid impugned has been passed.
Mrs. Das De, learned advocate appearing for therespondents submits that on the date when the noticeunder Section 148A(b) of the Act was issued, there wasno such information about the amalgamation of thenoticee. But, she is not in a position to deny thefactual position that before the date of passing theaforesaid impugned order, the respondent income taxauthority was informed about the amalgamation andmerger of the noticee.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase and submission of the parties, the aforesaidimpugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act andall subsequent proceedings against non existingnoticee stands quashed with liberty to the respondentincome tax authorities concerned to initiate freshassessment proceeding in accordance with law.
With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA 16324 of 2023 is disposed of.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.