EaseValue Act 2025Forms Case LawServices 💬 Ask our CA
Case Law › Section 148A
Income-tax Act · Case Law

Section 148A Income Tax Case Law — Reassessment Inquiry

Browse 2,910 Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court judgments that deal with Section 148A (Reassessment Inquiry) of the Income-tax Act. Each ruling shows the parties, citation, court, year and who it went in favour of — with the full order text. Use them to understand how Section 148A has been interpreted and to support a notice reply, appeal or assessment.

Got a Section 148A notice or dispute?

Our CA-led litigation team drafts replies and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) citing the right precedents.

Get expert help →

Judgments on Section 148A (showing 300 of 2,910)

Pan:aaaca8354Lrepresented By Its Director Mrs.rajshri Choudhary,138, Dr.radhakrishnan Street, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,O/O.the Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle – 2(1), Aayakar Bhavan, M.k.road,Mumbai
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Sarthak Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(1) & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
It Is Submitted That The Controversy In The Present Case Is Squarelycovered By A Decision Of A Division Bench Of This Court In The Case Of Hexawaretechnologies Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 15(1)(2) [(2024) 162 Taxmann.com 225 (Bombay
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 15078/2025 Cm Appl. 62033/2025 Ferra Engineering Pty Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation-1-3-1, Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
+ W.p.(C) 15210/2025 Cm Appl. 62378/2025 Harshit Finvest Pvt Ltd Through: Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocate v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 10 1 New Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.a v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation-2(1)(1), Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Surender Kumar Wadhwa v. Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-18 & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
M/S Empire Fasteners v. The Assistent Commissioner Of Income Tax . & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
M/S Empire Fasteners v. The Assistent Commissioner Of Income Tax . & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
+W.p.(C) 14580/2025 Cm Appl. 59830/2025Siam Stock Holdings Limited v. Assistant/ Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle International Taxation 3(1)(2) & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Hydro Engineering College Society v. Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rakesh Kohli (Deceased) Through Lrs v. Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Kushumba Devi v. Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank v. Principal, Commissioner Of Incometax And Another
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Vinod Kumar v. Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Shree Siddi Vinayak Forging Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Represented By Karta,No.177, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.Pan Aalhs5157D v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Nilesh Amarshibhai Rajapara v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Morbi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Seshasayee Vikram49/28, First Cross Street, Kasturba Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600020 v. Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15(1), Chennai, No. 121,Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -600034
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Zoom Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle - 5(1), New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
R.seethalakshmi v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16(1) Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Anmol Tradex Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 25 Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Income Tax Officer Ward 36(1) New Delhi v. Singh, Jsc Andms. Ravicha Sharma, Adv.khan, Jsc, Mr. V. Singh, Jsc Andms. Ravicha Sharma, Adv
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Sandeep Mittal (Ay 2016-17) S/O Shri Prem Prakash Mittal, Agedabout 49 Years, R/O 9, Mathur Vasiya Nagar, Behind Ram Mandir,Tonk Road, Opposite Morani Motors, Sanganer, Airport,Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajas v. For
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Hanaman Singh Son Of Shri Bhura Ram, Having His Address Atdhani Buriyo Ki, Ward No. 10, Reengus, Sikar 332001 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Neem Ka Thana Having Its Address Atnear Santoshi Mata Mandir, Chhawani Road, Khetri Mode,Godawas Road, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar 332713
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Munish Kumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Iconic Fashion Retailing Private Limited, 601, 6Th Floor, Gangaheights, Sb-154, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur Through Itsauthorised Signatory Pramila Khandelwal W/O Shri K C Gupta,Aged About 66 Years, v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Jaipur Ncr Building,Statute Circle, Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wpa 14225 Of 2024 Can 1 Of 2025 Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Pepsons Leasing And Finance Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 5(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Sargam Lefins Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) Kolkata & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1) Kolkata & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
R S Alloys v. Income Tax Officer Ward 63(1) Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Brahmi Fabrics Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Circle 4(2) Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Department & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Pinkcity Jewelhouse Private Limited, 76, Dhuleshwar Gardens,Jaipur 302001 Through Its Director Mrs. Kajal Goyal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle- 1, Jaipur,Room No 408, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkarcircle, Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(6) New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Narayan Dyestuff Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(1) Or His Successor
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
$~4 And 5 v. The Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Geeco Enercon Private Limited,Represented Director - Finance,C.gunasekaran v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 1(1) Trichy,2Nd Floor, Trichy - Main Building,Williams Road, Contonment,Trichy- 620 015
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
$~4 And 5 v. The Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Kamalakkannan Jayaraman v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 2128/2023 Pace Industries Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer , Ward 19(3) And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
N.palanikumar v. The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 19(3) And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Cwjc/19373/2024 Of Healing Touch Hospital v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Having Its Office At Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna 800001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
D.b. Civil Writ Petition No. 11782/2025 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6, Jaipur2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4,Jaipur.2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4,Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Shailendra Kumar, S/O Late Ram Chandra Ram, R/O Muni Kutir, Devangana Chowk, Po & Ps-Korra, District-Hazaribagh v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Bihar & Jharkhand), Central Revenue Building, Patna Jharkhand), Central Revenue Building, Patna
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11305/2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Crbuilding, Opp. Sessions Court, Jaipur Road, Ajmer,Rajasthan- 305001Building, Opp. Sessions Court, Jaipur Road, Ajmer,Rajasthan- 305001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Deputy Commissioner Of Circle - 31, Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Central Circle 31, Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Kolkata v. Mamta Choraria
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Assessee
+ W.p.(C) 6862/2023, Cm Appl. 26810/2023 Nimit Builders Private Limited (As Successor In The Interest Of Jk Jeet Clothes Private Limited And Verma Proptech Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Rao v. ' L(2023) [I ][56 ][Taxrnann.com ][I ][78 ][(Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/21733/2025 Of Sri Veerender Reddy Kura v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rep. By Its Partner, Mr.jeevabharathi v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Usha Martin Telematics Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Rangoli Infocom Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mrs.pramila,W/O.mr.mukesh Kumar,No.144, Purasawakkam High Road, Kellys Chennai -600 010,Tamilnadu India v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department, New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Narendra Kumar Agarwal v. Income 5Tax Office, Ward No.34(1), Kolkata And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 7053/2024 & Cm Appl. 29425/2024(Stay) Gaurav Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(1) Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Ravi Singh Bhatia, Aged About 42 Years, Son Of Jaswant Singh, Residing At 1/3, Begonia Tower, Near Narbheram School, Contractors Area, Bistupur, Sakchi, P.o & P.s- Sakchi, Town-Jamshedpur, District- E v. The Instant Writ Petition Has Been Filed For Grant Of The Following Substantive Reliefs
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 6845/2023, Cm Appl. 26781/2023 Viable Management Consultants Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Prabhakar Nerulkar, Aged 49 Years,Residing At House No. 208, Nearhanuman Temple, Verem, Bardez, Goa v. Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Panaji, Having Office At Aaykarbhavan, Plot No. 5, Edc Complex, Pattoplaza, Panaji, Goa — 403 001
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Heard Mr. T.chaitanya Kumar, Learncd Counsel For The v. The Contention Contention Of The Petitioner Is That
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Tungsten Automation England Limited (Formerly Known As Tungsten Network Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 3(1)(1) New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ned Counsel ][Lor ][The]Ms. [I).Sapna ][Reddy, Leamed ][Senior ][Standing]Petitioner And Counsel For [The ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][Appearing ][For ][The]Respondents. [Perused The ][Record' v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Tungsten Automation England Limited (Formerly Known As Tungsten Network Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 3(1)(1) New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon Corporate Circle-4, Main Building, 63 Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641018 v. Dr.mathew Cherianc-5, Parsns Royal Bunglow, Sesh Nestle, Nanjundapuram, Coimbatore 641036
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/12743/2025 Of Rajeswari Mullapudi v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Under Section 14Ga Of The Act As Also Under Section L4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessman Ner v. Income_Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Balch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section L4G
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Salesforce.com Singapore Pte. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle 3(1)(2), International Taxation,New Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Baba Global Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 29 & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
M/S. Zf Commercial Vehicle Control Systems India Limited(Formerly Known As Wabco India Limited)Rep. By Its Authorised Signatorydeepak M, Age 34 Yearss/O. Manoharan Rplot No.3 Sp, Iii Main Roadambattur v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Date Of Decision: 03.07.2025 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I & Another
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Under Section L48A Of The Act As Also Under Scction 148 Ol Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proccecled In A Fbcelessmanner v. 'Iq023) 156 Taxmann.corn [178 ][(Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Vinay Prakash Ahuja v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Non-Corporate Circle 7(1) No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Order; (Per Hon'bte Sri Justice Narsing Rao Nuntlitontla v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/16392/2025 Of M/S Natural Spirits v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp(C)/17539/2025 Of Dinabandhu Foundation For Educational Research And Socio Economic Development, Bbsr v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Exemptions)., Hyderabad
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wpo/183/2025 Nitin Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 46(1), Kolkata And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Monu Sharma v. Acit (Central) Shimla & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Brami Devi v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Suresh Kumar Malpani v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mukesh Sawhney v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mark Studio India Private Limitedno.11/6, First Floor, Ramanathan Streetmahalingapuram, Nungambakkamchennai 600 034Tamil Nadu v. Income Tax Officer Non Corporation Ward 10(6) 121, Mahathma Gandhi Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
P.kumaresan v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Dadha Pharma Llprep. By Its Designated Partner Mohanchand Pradeep Dadha v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Central Cir-1(4)Chennai 3[Rd] Floor Investigation Building No.46 (Old No.108)Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Mark Studio India Private Limitedno.11/6, First Floor, Ramanathan Streetmahalingapuram, Nungambakkamchennai 600 034Tamil Nadu v. Income Tax Officer Non Corporation Ward 10(6) 121, Mahathma Gandhi Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Wpa/3723/2025 Of Manoj Kumar Bagree v. Income Tax Officer Ward-30(1) And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Represented By Its General Manager Mr.r.jayasankar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle 1, Vellore Inocome Tax Officeno. 2 Barracks Cross Street, Officers Line Vellore -632 001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Old No. 104F New No. 680 20 Feet Road Peramanoor Narayanasamy Street Salem 636 007 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Salem No.3, Gandhi Road Salem 636 007.Prayer
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Selvaraj Savithriw/O.selvaraj, No.35, Dharmalingam 2Nd Street, Linemedu, Salem 636 006 v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1 (1) Salem, No.3, Gandhi Road, Salem-636 007
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Of Finance Act, 2021 [W.e.f., ][01.04.2021 ][Onwards, ][Proceedings v. ' L(2023) [156 ]Taxmann.com 178 (Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Shri Mitchell Wankhar … v. The Union Of India Represented By Its Secretary, Department Of Income Tax, Ministry Of Finance Department Of Income Tax, Ministry Of Finance
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Shri Mitchell Wankhar … v. The Union Of India Represented By Its Secretary, Department Of Income Tax, Ministry Of Finance Department Of Income Tax, Ministry Of Finance
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Ia No: Ga/1/2025, Ga/2/2025 Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(1), Kolkata v. Ample Vyapaar Private Limited
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Assessee
Heard Mr. A.v.a.siva Kartikeya, Learned Counsel For Thepetitioner And Ms. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Senior Standingcounsel For The Income Tax Department Appearing For Therespondents. Perused The Record v. The Content
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Revenue
Anvari Khatun, W/O Md. Samshad Alam, R/O Ward No. 18, Fasiya Dangal, Godda, P.o. & P.s.-Godda, District-Godda, Jharkhand v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Heard Mr. Manmohan Dundu, Leamed [Counsel ][For ][The]Petitioner And Mr. K. Sudhakar Reddy, Learned Senior [Standing]Counsel For The Lncome Tax Department [Appearing ][For ][The]Respondents. Perused T v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section L48A Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Lacelessmanner v. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2021 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section L48A As Also Under Section148 Of The Act Were Held To Be Bad With Con
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Heard Mr. M.naga Deepak, Leamed Counsel For The v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Rvhereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Wele Allo
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Manner v. The Income Tax Officer,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Now Address Changed To:51/3, Spencer Compound, Dindigul-624 001 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Vellore Institute Of Technologyrepresented By Its Chairman And Managing Trustee,Mr.g.viswanathanno.54, Thennamaram Street,Kospet, Vellore-632 001 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)Income Tax Departmentno.121, M.g.road, Nungambakkam,Chennai-600 034
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Wp/13055/2025 Of Sadashivanagar Youth Association v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Partly Allowed
Partly
Rep. By Its Secretary L.mohamed Kasim v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax,Income Tax Department, National E- Assessment Center,Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
D.b. Civil Writ Petition No. 6258/2022 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1), Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Kum Kum Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 28-1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Chandra Prakash Srivastava Ex Directorof Aten Portfolio Managers Privatelimited - Now Dissolved v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1-1, Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Manjeet Kaur Duggal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 52 1 Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 7917/2025 Evergreen Infrasolutions Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 7 1 Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+W.p.(C) 7153/2023Vk Global Publications Private Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax, Circle 25(1) & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Thereafter, By A Communication Dated 16.05.2022, The Ao Referred Tothe Decision Of The Supreme Court In Union Of India & Ors v. The Petitioner Contends That The Proceedings Initiated Pursuant To Theimpugned Notice Dated 27.07.2022 Are Required To Be Set Aside In View Of The
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Accolade Holdings Private Limited (Formerlyknown As Blue Eye Entertainment Privatelimited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajiv Kumar Khandelwal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 13(1) Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Parveen Kumar Malhotra v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(1),Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajesh Chopra v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 62(1) Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
%Date Of Decision : 28.05.2025 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 29(1),Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Kirti Kumar Dawar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-30(5),Delhi & Ors.delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mohan Lal Khinchi Son Of Late Shanti Lal Khinchi,Resident Of 214-A, Ward No. 50, Mandi Khatikan, Delhiroad, Jati Ji Ki Baghichi, Jaipur 302001Resident Of 214-A, Ward No. 50, Mandi Khatikan, Delhiroad, v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2), Jaipur Having Its Address At Newcentral Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur 302005
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Parag Keshav Bopardikar v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Hemraj Soni Legal Heir Of Late Indramal Soni, Aged About 42Years, R/O 115, Shri Shri Mal Bhawan, Sabji Mandi, Bijainagar,Ajmer - 305624 v. Income Tax Department, Ito Ward 1, Beawar, Courtcampus, Ajmer Road, Beawar, Rajasthan, 305901.Campus, Ajmer Road, Beawar, Rajasthan, 305901
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Apot/308/2024 Ia No: Ga/1/2025, Ga/2/2025 Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1) Kolkata v. Krushana Infra Property Private Limited And Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Revenue
Shri Radha Mohan Khandelwal, Legal Heir Of Late Smt. Anguridevi Khandelwal And S/O Of Late Shri Sitaram Khandelwal, Agedabout 62Years, R/O674 Khandaka Mansion , Bordi Ka Rasta, Kis-Hanpole Bazar Jaipu v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4, New Centralrevenue Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302005
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Shri Shyam Corporation, Having Its Address At 202, Block 11,Royal Green, Sirsi Road, Jaipur Through Its Partner Shri Pankajagarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Jaipur Having Its Address At Newcentral Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Das Road,Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ashish Girdhar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax, Circle 22(2), Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Kamal Sharma S/O Ram Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, Residentof 42, Lal Singh Judo Colony, Near Jaipuriya Hospital. Tonkroad, Jaipur - 302018 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(2), Ncr Building, Statuecircle, Jaipur.circle, Jaipur
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Date Of Decision: 14.05.2025 v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/7056/2024 Of Hrishikesh S/O Ajit Deshpande v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I, Nagpur And Others
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mr.sohanraj Praveen Kumar,S/O.sohanraj Jain v. Additional / Joint / Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax / Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre (Nfac), Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Rajendra Bana (A.y. 2017-18) S/O Shri Ram Niwas Bana, Agedabout 40 Years, R/O D-128, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Merta City,Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510 v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nagour, In Front Of Br Mirdhacollege, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001.College, Manasar Road, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341001
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Adm Agro Industries Laturand Vizag Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax, Circle 1(1), Delhi And Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Original Sideia No:ga/1/2025 Wpo/864/2024 M/S. Mj Grain Products Private Limited v. The Asst Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(1) & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
L For The v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And The Proceedings Initiated Under Section 148,4. As Also Under Section 148 Of
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, Proceedings Under Section 1484. Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of The Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless Manner v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Werc Allowed And The Proce
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
T Petition Where The Petition Where The [[Proceedings ]][[Are ][Either]][[Either v. Income-Tax Offtcert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Wcre Allowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section 148A As Also Under Section148 Of The Act Were Held To Be Bad With
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 0L .04.2021 Onwards, Proceedingsunder Section L48A Of The Act As Also.under. Section L4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Prooeeded In A Facelessmanner v. The Contention Of The Petitioner Is That The Issue Contention Of The Petitioner Is That The Issue Of The Petitioner I
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Lalit Gulati v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 28(1), Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Unsel [For ][The ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][For ][Respondent]Nos.2 & 3. [Perused The ][Record v. The Union Of India
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Original Sideia No:ga/1/2025 Wpo/863/2024 Rangeet Auto Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/32192/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ratnagiri Gas And Power Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 19(1), Delhi & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Order, (Per L{On'ble Sri Justice P.sam Koshy v. '[(2023) [156 ][Taxmann.com ][178 ][(Telangana
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, [Proceedings]Under Section I48A Of The Act As Also Under Section [T48 ][Of ][The]Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And [Proceeded ][In A ][Faceless]Ma v. Income-Tax Officiirt Decidedon 14.09.2023 W
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Under Section 1484 Of The Act As Arso Under Sectiorr R4G Of The Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded I.r A Faceless Manner v. Income_Tax Officiirt Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And The Proceedings Init
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/29746/2024 Of Anil Kumar Kasaraneni v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Eddy Mantur, Learned Counsel [For]The Petitioner And Mr K.sudhakar [(Eddy, ][Leamed Senior ][Standing]Counsel For The Income Tax Department For [The ][Respondents]Perused The Record v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Heard Mr. A.v. Raghu Ram, Leamed [Counsel ][For ][The]Petitioner And Mr. K. Sudhakar Reddy, Leamed Senior [Standing]Counsel For The Income Tax [Department ][For ][The ][Respondents]Perused The Record v. The Contention Contention Of The Petitioner The Petitioner Petitioner Is That The Issue Ofthat The Issue Ofthe Issue Ofissue Ofof
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Revenue
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, Proceedingsunder Section L48A Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section 148A As Also Under
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/28675/2024 Of Hyderabad Race Club v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Katram Reddy Mantur, Learned Counsel [For]The Petitioner And Mr K.sudhakar [Reddy, ][Learned ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel For The Income Tax Department For The [Respondents.]Perused The Record v. The Assessing Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Revenue
Of Finance Act, 2O2L W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, Proceedings Under Section 148,4. Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Ofthe Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless Manner v. Income-Tax Officer1 Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/31476/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Manner v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/32190/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited Madur v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section L4Ga Ofa Act As Also Under Section Act Ought To Have 148 Of The Llranner. ",." On ,Een Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless v. Inc,Me-Tax Offrcerr ; On R4.09.2023Wh6Rebv N A Batch H
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
> Under Section L4Ga Of The Act As Also Under Section L4G Of The Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless Manner v. Tncome_Ta
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Under S,:Ction 14Ga Of The Act As Also Under Section T4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceedrd In A Facelessmanner v. Income_Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions W( R.c Arowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section T+Sa M Olso Undc.r. Section148 Of The Act We
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
> Under Section 148,{ Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of The Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Laceless Manner 4. The Contention Of The Petitioner Is That The Issue Of v. Tncome-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Aliowed And
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/32124/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section [148A ][Of The Act ][As Also ][Under ][Section ][148 ][Of ][The]Actoughttohavealsobeenissuedandproceededinalacelessmanner v. '[(2023) [156 ][Taxmann.corn ][I ][78 (Telangana
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/32146/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited Tekmal v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Perused The Record v. 'L(2023) [156 ]Taxmann.com [178 ][(Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Under Section I48A Of The Act As Also Under Section L4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Lacelessltlanneract Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Lacelessltlann v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section L48A Of The Act As Also Under Section L4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. The Contention Of The Petitioner Contention Of The Petitioner Of The Petitioner The Petitioner Petitioner Is That The Issue That The Issue Issue Of
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp(C)/10602/2025 Of M/S Regulated Market Committee , Attabira v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Department, New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Of Finance [Act, ][2021 ][W'e'f', ][01'04'2021 Onwards' ][Proceedings v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section L48A Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of The v. 'L(2023) [I ][56 ][Taxmann.com ][178 ][(Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
> Under Section 1484. Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of The Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless Manner. 4. The Contention Of The Petitioner Is That The Issue Of v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And The Proceedings Initiated Under Section 148A As Also Under Section
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
And Sec 14Ba Of The Income Tax Act, 'R G61, And To Consequenry Set Aside Thesame In The Interests Of Justiceiano:1O F 2024 v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Revenue
Wp/13859/2023 Of M/S Ms Agarwal Foundries Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(1)
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Order: (Per Llon'ble Sri Justice P.sam Koshy v. 'L(2023) [156 ][Taxrann.com ][Lt8 ][(Telan
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/14354/2023 Of Mr. Pavan Kumar Cholleti v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Order, (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.sam Koshy v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Lranner v. The Contention Contention Of T[-Re Petitioner T[-Re Petitioner Petitioner Is That Tl're Issue Ofthat Tl're Issue Oftl're Issue Ofissue Ofof
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Saroj Mehndi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 49.1 & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section 148,{ Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of [The]Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Not Being Issued In A Faceless Manner, Have Already Been Dealt With And Decided By This Court In The Case Ol Kankanala Ravindra Reddy v. Income-Tax Officei.t Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Limited v. Assitant Commissioner Of Incometax & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 0L .04.2021 Onwarrls. Proceedingsunder Section 1484. Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmannel' v. '[(2023) 156 Taxmann.com 178 (Telangana
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Order: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda v. Income-Tax Ofi,-I( Lerr Decided On 14
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
This Writ Petition Is Being Taken Up Today Only On One Of The v. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed [And]The Proceeding
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/33475/2024 Of Primary Agricutural Cooperative Society Ltd Mannoor v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Down The Line, We Find That The Same Issue Has Also Beendecided Against The Revenue Byvanous High Courts I.e.,By The Bombay High Court In The Case Of Hexawaretechnologies Ltd v. Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax & Others2, Gauhati High
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
La No: 1 Of 2024 v. Raghu Ram
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/204/2025 Of M/S Bhavya Constructions Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, Proceedingsunder Section 14Ga Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 14G Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Order, (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Narsing Rdo Nandikonda v. '1Q023) [156 ]Taxmann.com L7G (Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/33723/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Co Operativesociety Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ba Of The Lncome Tax Act, 1G61, And Consequenfly Set Aside The Same In Theinterests Of Justiceia No:10F 2024Interests Of Justiceia No:10F 2024 v. A. Siva Kartikeyasrt. A. V. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/33540/2024 Of Pacs Bidrelly Hq Mudhole v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section 148,,4. Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. Income-Tax Officeri Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed Andthe Proc
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/33698/2024 Of Primary Agricultural Co- Operativesociety Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officert De
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/33454/2024 Of Primary Agricutural Co Operative Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+ W.p.(C) 4195/2025, Cm Nos.19446/2025 & 19447/2025 Gsm Auto Spares Private Limited v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Department Delhi And Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
This Is A Writ Petition Is A Writ Petition Writ Petition Petition Where The Proceedings The Proceedings Proceedings Are Eithereither v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/3169/2025 Of Srikanth Panthulu v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/12983/2025 Of Sri Bramaramba Mallikharjuna Swamy Temple, v. The Income Tax Officer,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Kradhar Reddy Learned [Counsel ][For ][The]Petitioner And Ms. B.sapna Reddy, Learned Junior [Standing]Counsel For The Income Tax Department [For ][Respondents. ][Perused]The Record v. Income-Tax ][Officert ][Decided]On 14.09.2023 [Whereby ][A ][Batch ][Of Writ ][Petitions ][Were ][Allowed ][And]The Proceedings [Initiated ][Under Section 148A ][As Also ][Under Section]L48Oftheactwer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/2215/2025 Of Mir Ashfaq Zaheer v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/33509/2024 Of Primary Agricutural Cooperative Society Ltd Mannoor v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Wcre Allowed And The Proceedings Initiated Under Section 148A As Also Under S
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> And The Subsequent Initiation Of Proceedings Under Section L4G Of v. Income-Tax Offi(]Er Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Wele Allowed And The Proceedings Initiated Under Sect
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/33424/2024 Of Primary Agricutural Co Operative Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Itioner And Ms. J.sunitha, [Learned]Nior Standing Counsel [For]The Income Tax [Department ][For ][The]Respondents. [Perused ][The]Record v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
+ W.p.(C) 4773/2025, Cm Appl. 21987/2025 & Cm Appl. 21989/202521989/2025+ W.p.(C) 4789/2025, Cm Appl. 22031/2025 & Cm Appl. 22033/2025Supershine Laundry Systems Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Sapnareddy, ][Learned ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel For The [Income ][Tax ][Department ][For ][The ][Respondents']Perused The Record v. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed Andthe Proceedings Initia
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
And Sec 148A Of The Lncome Tax Act, 196.1 , And To Consequen,Y Set Aside Thesame In The Interests Of Justicela No: 1 Of 2025Same In The Interests Of Justicela No: 1 Of 2025 v. A. Siva Kartkeyasrl. A. V. A. Siva Kartkeya
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Of Finance Ac 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onuards. Proceedingsunder Section L48A Olthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act, 2021 W.e.f., 01.04.2021 Onwards, Proceedingsunder Section L4Ga Of Rhe Act As Also Under Section L4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner v. Income_Tax Officert Decidedon 14-09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Ailowed Andthe Proceedings Initiated Under Section R4Ga As Also Under Section148 Of The Act
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/2768/2025 Of Mr.rajasekhar Jonnavithula v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
The Contention Contention Of The The [[Petitioner ]]Is That The That The The [[Issue ]]Of v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/34335/2024 Of Primary Agricutural Co Operative Society Limited v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+ W.p.(C) 4773/2025, Cm Appl. 21987/2025 & Cm Appl. 21989/202521989/2025+ W.p.(C) 4789/2025, Cm Appl. 22031/2025 & Cm Appl. 22033/2025Supershine Laundry Systems Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax , Circle 1(2)(2), New Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/29364/2024 Of Krishna Reddy Roopireddy v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/12023/2025 Of Sri Doreraju Sambasivaiah v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/34606/2024 Of Rajaboiena Vinay Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mohd Athar Anjum v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Under Section 148.4 Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Ofthe Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Faceless Manner v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/12163/2025 Of Primary Agriculture Co-Operative Society, v. The Income Tax Officer,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Iv. Quash The Notice Issued Under Section 148 Dated 13.03.2024 For Ay 2017-18 (Annexure-D) Issued By Respondent No.1 v. Quash The Ex Parte Assessment Order Passed Under Section 147 Rws 144 Dated 02.01.2025 For Ay 2017-18 (Annexure – E) Issued By Respondent No.3
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/17112/2023 Of Sri. Kaluram Chawat v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/11225/2025 Of Vishala Karnataka Govt And Private Employees Housing Coop Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
La No: 1 Of 2025 v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Dent No.2. Perused The [Record v. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions W Jre Allowed Andravindra Reddy Vs. Income-Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petiti
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/9558/2025 Of Sanjeeva Mekala v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
First India Estates And Services Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ed ][Counsel ][For ][The v. The Contention Of The Contention Of The Of The The [[Petitioner ]]Is That The That The The [[Issue ]]Ol
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Under Section L48A Ofthe Act As Also Under Section 148 Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded Rn A Facelessmanner v. ' L(2023) [I ][56 ][Taxman
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/9829/2025 Of M/S. The Large Sized Cooperative Society Limited, v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/10512/2025 Of Ali Arshad v. Income-Tax Officeri Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And The Proceedings Initiated Under Section T48A As Also Under
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section 148A Of The Act As Also Under Section 148 Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceede D In A Facelessmanner.act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceede D In A Facelessmanne v. ' L(2023) [I ]56 Taxmann.corn 178 (Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
The Contention Contention Of The The [[Petitioner ]]Is [[That ][The ][Issue ][Of]][[The ][Issue ][Of]][[Issue ][Of]][[Of v. 'L(2023) [156 ][Taxmann.com ][178 ][(Telangana)L
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/5109/2025 Of Leelavathi Arava v. Income Tax Officer,
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Counsel For The Petlitioner: Sri A v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
First India Estates And Services Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Of Finance Act,202L W.e.f., 01.04.2021 [Onwards, ][Proceedings v. Income_
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/12134/2025 Of Young Mens Indian Association v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/17211/2023 Of Sri. Kaluram Chawat v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
> Picture [72 X 72] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 10 New Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section 14Ga Ofthe Act As Also Under Section L4G Oftheact Ought To Have Also Been Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceeded In A Facelessmanner.manner v. Income_Tax Officert Decidedon 14.09.2023 Whereby A Batch Of Writ Petitions Were Ailowed Andthe Proceedings
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
> And Decided By This Court['In ] The Case Of Kankanala Ravindra Reddy v. Income-Tax Officert Decided On 14.09.2023 Whereby A Bltch Of Writ Petitions Were Allowed And
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
'L(2023) [1 ][56 ][Taxmann.com ][178 ][(Telangana)L v. Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax & Others2, Gauhari High Court In The Caseof Ram Narayan Sah Vs. Union Of India3, Punjab Andharyana High Courl In The Case Of Jatinder Singh
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section 148,{ Of The Act As Also Under Secticn [148 ][Of ][The]Act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And [Proceeded ]In [A ][Faceless]Manner v. The Contention Contention Of The Petitioner The Petitioner Petitioner Is That The Issue Olthat The Issue Olthe Issue Olissue Olol
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
This Writ Writ [[Petition ]][[Is Being Taken ][Up ][Today ]][[Up ][Today ]][[Today ]][[Only ][On ][One ][Of ][The]][[On ][One ][Of ][The]][[One ][Of ][The]][[Of ][The]][[The v. Income Tax Officerward17(1)
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Under Section I48A Of The Act As Also Under Sect;On I4G Of Theact Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceedec In A Facelessmanller.act Ought To Have Also Been Issued And Proceedec In A Facelessmanlle v. Income_
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Smart Chip Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle – 25
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
The Decision Of The Supreme Court In Union Of India v. The Assessment Proceedings Were Conducted In Accordance With Theprocedure Prescribed Under Section 144B Of The Act And The Sameculminated In An Assessment Order Dated 19.05.2023
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
+ W.p.(C) 5056/2025 Cm Appl. 23211/2025 Cm Appl. 23212/2025 Ernst And Young U.s. Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 1 2 2 Delhi Through
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Adm Agro Industries Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+ W.p.(C) 5056/2025 Cm Appl. 23211/2025 Cm Appl. 23212/2025 Ernst And Young U.s. Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 1 2 2 Delhi Through
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
The Petitioner Also Impugns The Notice Issued Under Section 148A(B)Of The Act, And The Order Passed Under Section 148A(D) Of The Act Prior Tothe Issuance Of The Impugned Notice v. Rajeev Bansal : 2024Scc Online Sc 2693 And Drew The Attention Of This Court To The Followingpassages From The Said Judgment
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/11617/2025 Of Krishnarajapete Chandrashekara Shrikanth v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+W.p.(C) 3509/2025 And Cm Appl. 16394/2025Landcraft Developers Privatelimited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [34 X 35] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Puran Store Through Its Partner Hari Ramagarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle 43- 1 & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Ankit Agarwal Son Of Shri Ganesh Agarwal, Presently Residing At Flat No.413, Athena Apartment, Jai Singh Highway, P.s. Bani Park, District Jaipur(Rajasthan v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Bihar And Jharkhand,1Stfloor, C.r. Building, Beerchand Patel Marg, Patna.floor, C.r. Building, Beerchand Patel Marg, Patna
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/26080/2024 Of Mr. Mohammed Yaseen v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/9482/2025 Of Ballupet Basavaraj Devkumar v. The Assessment Unit / Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Umesh Chandra Sharma v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(1
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+W.p.(C) 7032/2023 And Cm Appl. 22284/2025Aam Aadmi Party v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Centralcircle 3 & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/24235/2024 Of Surya Chandra Prasad v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Cognyte Technologies Israel Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
J. G’s Departmental Store v. Income Tax Officer Ward 60(1) & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/9812/2025 Of Basavashree Credit Co-Operative Society v. The Income Tax Officer,
High Court · 2025 · Partly Allowed
Partly
> Picture [34 X 34] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle27, Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Mrs. Lalitha Raj, Wife Of Mr v. Govinda Raj, Aged About 55 Years, Residing At No. 207/2, Sri. Sapthagiri Niwas, 5[Th] Cross, Kammanahalli Main Road, Kacharakanahalli, Bengaluru – 560 084
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
Wp/9443/2025 Of Ramakrishnaiah Manjunath v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/9151/2025 Of Ramakrishnaiah Manjunath v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ramadoss Srikanthi v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Nafr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income -Tax, Circle - 1(1), Raipur (C.g
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Nc: 2025:Khc:14088 v. The Income Tax Officer In Wp No.24076/2023 Dated 08.01.2024_ , As Under
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/31546/2024 Of Ramesh Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/16843/2024 Of Matada Channabasaiah Siddabasaiah v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/24040/2024 Of Yashaswini Buildlers Private Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Ankit Khandelwal v. Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
In Mon Mohan Kohli v. In The Present Case, The Ao Provided Such Information By Issuing Anotice Under Section 148A(B) Of The Act On 01.06.2022. The Petitioner Wasgranted Time Till 16.06.2022 To Respond To The Said Notice. T
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
The Material On Record Will Indicate That Having Regard To The Minimum Period Of Seven Days Prescribed Under Section 148A(B) Of The It Act As Held By The High Court Of Bombay In The Case Of Mukesh J. v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 27(2)(1) – W.p.no.15268/2023
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/26192/2024 Of Krishnappa Sampigehalli Muninanjappa v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Revenue
Wp/7774/2024 Of Hemnath Pushparaj v. Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/9388/2025 Of Sri Mayige Kumar Gowda v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Department,
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
+ W.p.(C) 17561/2022 Huawei International Pte Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Makemytrip India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16 (1) Delhi & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
+W.p.(C) 5782/2025 And Cm Appls. 26372-74/2025Lord Fincap Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-13(1
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
> Picture [34 X 34] Intentionally Omitted <== v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
Bhagwan Sahai Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee
The Present Petition Is Filed For The Following Reliefs v. B. This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Issue Such Other Relief Or Reliefs As This Hon'ble Court Deems Fit, In The Petitioner's Case, In The Interest Of Justice
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wp/101710/2022 Of Shri Shivarudrappa S/O Kashappa Kiragi v. The Income Tax Department
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
Assessee

Read the bare provision: Income-tax Act 2025 → · More: all income-tax case law →

General information from public-domain judgments (via Open India Law, CC BY 4.0). Not legal advice — verify against the original order.

Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan