Wp/2245/2025 Of Srs Shelters v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/2245/2025 Of Srs Shelters v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-20, 2018-19
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/2245/2025 Of Srs Shelters v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitally signedbyMARIGANGAIAHPREMAKUMARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
-WRIT PETITION NO. 2245 OF 2025 (TIT)
C/W
-WRIT PETITION NO. 2367 OF 2025 (TIT)
IN WP No. 2245/2025
BETWEEN:
S R S SHELTERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932, NO.5/6 AND 5/7, HALEHALLI VILLAGE, KITHAGANNUR ROAD, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST-560 049, PAN. .
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER,
SRI. VUPPALA SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O V VENKAT REDDY, NO.5/6 AND 5/7, HALEHALLI VILLAGE, KITHAGANNUR ROAD, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST-560 049
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 4(2)(1), BANGALORE - 560 095. WARD - 4(2)(1), BANGALORE - 560 095.
2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI 110 003.
3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2,THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 095
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI AND SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(b) OF THE ACT, DATED. 04.03.2023 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1050411478(1) ISSUED BY THE R-1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
IN WP NO. 2367/2025
BETWEEN:
1. S R S SHELTERS,
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932, NO.5/6 AND 5/7, HALEHALLI VILLAGE, KITHAGANNUR ROAD, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST-560 049, PAN. .
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI. VUPPALA SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O V VENKAT REDDY, NO.5/6 AND 5/7, HALEHALLI VILLAGE, KITHAGANNUR ROAD, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST-560 049
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME T AX OFFICER WARD 4(2)(1), BANGALORE - 560 095 WARD 4(2)(1), BANGALORE - 560 095
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(3)(3), BANGALORE 560 095 WARD 4(3)(3), BANGALORE 560 095
3. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT
NC: 2025:KHC:5299
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 10 003.
4. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2, THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 095 THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 095
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI AND SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT, DATED 17/03/2022 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1040977536(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
NC: 2025:KHC:5299WP No. 2245 of 2025C/W WP No. 2367 of 2025
COMMON ORAL ORDER
1. Both the above petitions relate to the same petitioner
and for assessment years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 respectively. Both the petitions are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI AND SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT, DATED 17/03/2022 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1040977536(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
NC: 2025:KHC:5299WP No. 2245 of 2025C/W WP No. 2367 of 2025
COMMON ORAL ORDER
1. Both the above petitions relate to the same petitioner
and for assessment years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 respectively. Both the petitions are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.
2. Petitioner a partnership firm is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the order passed under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and notice issued under Section 148 of the Act and also the order passed under Sections 147 r/w 144, 144B of the Act along with the order of penalty.
3. Heard learned counsel Sri Ravi Shankar S.V. for the petitioner and learned counsel Sri E.I. Sanmathi, for the respondents/revenue.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner/Partnership firm consists of three partners and one of the partner is before this Court praying for an opportunity to participate in the proceedings initiated by
NC: 2025:KHC:5299WP No. 2245 of 2025C/W WP No. 2367 of 2025
issuance of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. Learned counsel would submit that the petitioner/firm could not participate in the proceedings on issuance of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, due to internal dispute of the partners. However, he submits that the firm through the partner, who is before this Court intends to clear the liability and the partner, who is before this Court undertakes to participate in assessment proceedings and also undertakes to file documents on behalf of the firm. Learned counsel would submit that in that regard, the affidavit of one of the Partners i.e.,Sri Vuppala Srinivas Reddy is filed. Learned counsel would submit that the order passed under Section 148A(d) and subsequent penalty order is ex-parte order as the petitioner had no opportunity, in view of their default. It is prayed for an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and thereafter, it is prayed to pass an order in accordance with law.
5. On the other hand, Learned counsel for the respondent/revenue would submit that this is not a case of
NC: 2025:KHC:5299WP No. 2245 of 2025C/W WP No. 2367 of 2025
not receiving notices, but they could not participate in the proceedings due to their internal dispute. Learned counsel Sri Sanmathi, would further submit that though the order is an ex-parte order, the petitioner cannot be given an opportunity without their being any condition. Thus he prays for passing appropriate order in the matter.
6. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and on perusal of the entire writ petition papers, I am of the view, that the petitioner/firm represented by one of the partner Sri Vuppala Srinivas Reddy ought to be given an opportunity to file objection to notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act and to participate in the proceedings. No doubt the notices issued by the respondent/authority under Section 148A(b) of the Act was served on the firm and firm failed to appear before the respondent/authority, for their non-appearance, the partners of the firm themselves are responsible. Since substantial right of the petitioner is involved and the order passed against the firm is exparte order, I deem it appropriate to provide an opportunity to the petitioner-Sri Vuppala Srinivas Reddy to
file objection and participate in the proceedings. Hence the following :-
ORDER
a. Both the above writ petitions are allowed in part.
file objection and participate in the proceedings. Hence the following :-
ORDER
a. Both the above writ petitions are allowed in part.
b. Annexures A1 to A5 in both the above petitions are quashed and the matters are remanded to the stage of filing objection to Annexure-A Notice issued under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act.
c. Three weeks time granted to the petitioner to file objection to the notice at Annexure-B dated 04.03.2023.
d. The petitioner shall appear before the 1[st] respondent
on 06.03.2025 and the respondent shall proceed in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42 CT:SNN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.