Wp/9327/2024 Of Gouse Peer v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
21 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/9327/2024 Of Gouse Peer v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/9327/2024 Of Gouse Peer v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned byLEELAVATHIS R
Location:High Court ofKarnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 9327 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
GOUSE PEER SON OF LATE KHADAR MOHADDIN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO 03, 4TH CROSS SEETHAPAP LAYOUT MANORA YANAPALYA, BANGALORE NORTH R T NAGAR BANGALORE 560032 PREVIOUSLYA AT NO. 35, VENKATASHAMAPPA LAYOUT 5TH CROSS, R T NAGAR CHAMUNDI NAGAR BANGALORE 560032.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5(2)(1) BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(3)(1) BANGALORE BMTC BUILDNG
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12079
80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095
3.THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX KARANTAKA AND GOA BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095 INCOMET TAX KARANTAKA AND GOA BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095
4.ASSESSMENT UNIT NATIONAL FACELSS ASSESSMENT CENTRE INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO 401, 2ND FLOOR E RAMP, JAWARLAL NEHRU STADIUM DELHI 110003. NATIONAL FACELSS ASSESSMENT CENTRE INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO 401, 2ND FLOOR E RAMP, JAWARLAL NEHRU STADIUM DELHI 110003.
(BY SRI. M THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148(b) OF THE ACT DTD 23.02.2023 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016.17 BY THE R1 BEARING DIN AND NOTICE NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022.23/1050050187(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner has filed this petition seeking for the following
reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 23.02.2023 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1050050187(1) herein marked as Annexure - A.
b) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.03.2023 passed under section 148A(d) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.2 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1051629512(1) herein marked as Annexure - A1.
c) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 30.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.2 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1051645625(1) herein marked as Annexure - A2. d) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 29.02.2024 passed under section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1061706717(1) herein marked as Annexure - A3.
e) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice dated 29.02.2024 issued under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1061706738(1) herein marked as Annexure - A4.
f) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of
certiorari quashing the penalty notice dated 29.02.2024 issued under section 271(1)(b) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1061706737(1) herein marked as Annexure - A5.
e) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice dated 29.02.2024 issued under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1061706738(1) herein marked as Annexure - A4.
f) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of
certiorari quashing the penalty notice dated 29.02.2024 issued under section 271(1)(b) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1061706737(1) herein marked as Annexure - A5.
g) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty notice dated 29.02.2024 issued under section 271F of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.4 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1061706739(1) herein marked as Annexure - A6.
h) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged
in the present writ petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to bona fidereasons/unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, the petitioner could not submit reply to the notice at Annexure-A2, dated 23.02.2023, issued by respondent No.1 under Section 148 A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961[1] and as such, the said notice as well as all further proceedings and further notices pursuant thereto may be set aside and the matter may be remitted back to the stage of the respondent No.1 issuing a fresh notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act and to proceed further in accordance with law.
1 Hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’
NC: 2025:KHC:12079
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
4. Though several contentions have been urged by both the sides in support of their claims, it is an undisputed fact born out from the material on record that the petitioner had not filed his reply to the aforesaid notice at Annexure-A dated 23.02.2023 issued by respondent No.1 under Section 148 of the IT Act.
5. Under these circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned notices/orders at Annexures-A1 to A6 and remit the matter back to the stage of submitting reply to notice under Section 148A(b) atAnnexure-A issued by respondent No.2 and reserve liberty in favour of the petitioner to contest all further notices, proceedings, etc., in accordance with law.
6. In the result, the following
ORDER
i) Petition is hereby allowed.
ii) The impugned notices/orders at Annexures-A1 to A6 are hereby set aside. The matter is remitted back to the stage of petitioner submitting reply to Annexure-A dated 23.02.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act and to proceed further in accordance with law and liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, documents, etc., to Annexure-A1, dated 23.02.2023which shall be considered by respondent No.1, who shall provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed to further in accordance with law.
iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, documents etc., to Annexure-A1 dated 23.02.2023 which shall be considered by respondent No.1 who shall provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.