Mrs. Bharti Jain, Wife Of Mr. Pramod Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Near Govardhan Gate,Bharatpur
High Court
25 Nov 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Mrs. Bharti Jain, Wife Of Mr. Pramod Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Near Govardhan Gate,Bharatpur
Date of order
25 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mrs. Bharti Jain, Wife Of Mr. Pramod Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Near Govardhan Gate,Bharatpur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with aforesaidliberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12037/2024
Mrs. Bharti Jain, Wife Of Mr. Pramod Jain, Aged About 53 Years,Resident Of D-767, 2Nd Floor, Saraswati Vihar, New Delhi-110034.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Near Govardhan Gate,Bharatpur- 321001Bharatpur- 321001
2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward-I, NearGovarshan Gate, Bharatpur- 321001Govarshan Gate, Bharatpur- 321001
3. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, RajasthanRegion, Income Tax Building, Jaipur- 302005Region, Income Tax Building, Jaipur- 302005
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharatt Grower through VCFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop SinghFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singh
Ms. N.S. Bhati
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
25/11/2024
1.Though number of grounds have been urged to assail theorder dated 22.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 followed by an order of assessment dated25.04.2024, it is not in dispute that aggrieved by the order ofassessment, an appeal has been filed.
2.As the petitioner has already taken recourse to the statutoryremedy of appeal available to her under the law, we are notinclined to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction to entertain thispetition.
3.The petitioner is at liberty to raise all the grounds before theappellate authority in the pending appeal.
4.The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with aforesaidliberty.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
NAVAL KISHOR /Gaurav/15
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.