Anvari Khatun v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi
High Court
16 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Anvari Khatun v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi
Date of order
16 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Anvari Khatun v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 7.The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 2187 of 2025
Anvari Khatun, W/o Md. Samshad Alam, R/o Ward No. 18, Fasiya Dangal, Godda, P.O. & P.S.-Godda, District-Godda, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi
2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(5), Sahibganj
3.The National Faceless Assessment Center, New Delhi
4.The Assessment Unit, the National Faceless Assessment Center, New Delhi Delhi
… … Respondents
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Petitioner: For the Respondents:
Mr. N.K. Pasari, Advocate
Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate
-----
02/16.06.2025
1.Heard both sides.
2.In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the respondent no. 4 under Section 147 read with Sections 144 & 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 28.11.2024 passed by the respondent no. 4 under Section 147 read with Sections 144 & 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3.It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that prior to passing such order, it is necessary to serve a notice on the petitioner under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that in the instant case, such procedure has not been complied by the respondent no.4. to passing such order, it is necessary to serve a notice on the petitioner under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that in the instant case, such procedure has not been complied by the respondent no.4.
4.Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department, on instructions, admits that no such notice under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been served on the petitioner before passing the impugned order. admits that no such notice under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been served on the petitioner before passing the impugned order.
5.Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent no. 4 for fresh consideration. remanded to the respondent no. 4 for fresh consideration.
Satish/Vikas/-
6.The respondent no. 4 shall serve a notice on the petitioner on the address indicated in the writ petition under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and then proceed further in the matter. address indicated in the writ petition under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and then proceed further in the matter.
7.The writ petition is disposed of.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J)
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.