Wp/9482/2025 Of Ballupet Basavaraj Devkumar v. The Assessment Unit / Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/9482/2025 Of Ballupet Basavaraj Devkumar v. The Assessment Unit / Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/9482/2025 Of Ballupet Basavaraj Devkumar v. The Assessment Unit / Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned byMALATESHK C
Location:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF APRIL, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION No.9482 OF 2025 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
BALLUPET BASAVARAJ DEVKUMAR SON OF BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BALLUPET, BALLUPET POST, SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN, KARNATAKA -573 134
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI A.SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI MADHUSUDHAN U A, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE ASSESSMENT UNIT / INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003 MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 - HASSAN, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 2 STAGE, BELUR ROAD, HASSAN, KARNATAKA -573 201 WARD 1 - HASSAN, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 2 STAGE, BELUR ROAD, HASSAN, KARNATAKA -573 201
3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA AND GOA, OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA AND GOA,
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,
QUEEN'S ROAD, BANGALORE – 560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.THIRUMALESH AND SRI M.DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.03.2024 PASSED UNDER SECTION 147 R.W.S 144 R.W.S 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1063341176(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A1 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the assessment order dated 25.03.2024 passed under section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1063341176(1) herein marked as Annexure - A1.
b) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the computation sheet dated 25.03.2024 issued by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 bearing DIN & Document No. ITBA/AST/S/114/2023-24/1063341210(1) herein marked as Annexure - A2.
c) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice of demand dated 25.03.2024 issued under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year
NC: 2025:KHC:15971
2016-17 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1063341195(1) herein marked as Annexure - AЗ.
d) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 09.09.2024 passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 bearing DIN & Document No. ITBA/REC/M/154/2024-25/1068451013(1) herein marked as Annexure - A4.
e) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order dated 26.09.2024 passed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2024-25/1069220198(1) herein marked as Annexure - A5.
f) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the computation sheet dated 26.09.2024 issued by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 pertaining to the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1063341230(1) herein marked as Annexure - A6.
e) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order dated 26.09.2024 passed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2024-25/1069220198(1) herein marked as Annexure - A5.
f) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the computation sheet dated 26.09.2024 issued by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 pertaining to the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1063341230(1) herein marked as Annexure - A6.
g) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice of demand dated 26.09.2024 issued under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 pertaining to the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & Notice
No. ITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1069209737(1) herein marked as Annexure - A7.
h) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order dated 25.09.2024 passed under section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2024-25/1069203423(1) herein marked as Annexure - A8.
i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the computation sheet dated 25.09.2024 issued by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 pertaining to the penalty levied under section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1063341231(1) herein marked as Annexure - A9.
j) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice of demand dated 25.09.2024 issued under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 pertaining to the penalty levied under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1069203348(1) herein marked as Annexure - A10.
k) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 28.03.2022 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent
No.2 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/17/2022-23/1051506363(1) herein marked as Annexure - B1.
l) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 31.03.2023 passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.2 bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1051795914(1) herein marked as Annexure B2.
m) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the approval granted under section 151 of the Act dated 31.03.2023 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.3 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/118/2022-23/1051790271(1) herein marked as Annexure - B3.
n) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 31.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1051796353(1) herein marked as Annexure - B4.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15971
n) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 31.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 by the Respondent No.1 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1051796353(1) herein marked as Annexure - B4.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15971
issued notice dated 28.03.2023 under Section 148A(b) of the I.T.Act, to which the petitioner filed his reply. Thereafter, the respondents passed the impugned order dated 31.03.2023 under Section 148A(d) of the I.T.Act. Subsequently, the respondents issued various notices, to which the petitioner filed his replies dated 14.06.2023, 24.06.2023 and 23.11.2023 and with respectto the show cause notice dated 25.02.2024, the petitioner filed his reply dated 27.02.2024. However, the respondents failed to consider the same and proceeded to pass the impugned order under Section 147 r/w Section 144 r/w Section 144B of the I.T.Act at Annexure A1 dated 25.03.2024 and rectification order under Section 154 of the I.T. Act at Annexure A4 dated 09.09.2024. It is therefore submitted by the learned Senior counsel that if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to reply to the aforesaid notices issued by the respondents by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
NC: 2025:KHC:15971
5. A perusal of the impugned order and the material on record will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that the petitioner submitted reply /response dated 27.02.2024 along with documents to the show cause notice dated 25.02.2024 and the 1[st] respondent failed to consider the said reply stating that the petitioner has not furnished supporting documents in support of the submissions/contentions made by the petitioner. Under these circumstances, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure–A dated 25.03.2024, rectification order under Annexure-A4 dated 09.09.2024 and subsequent notices / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to the 1[st]respondent for reconsideration afresh from the stage of petitioner submitting his reply/response to the show cause notice and in the event, the petitioner files his reply/ response, the 1[st] respondent is directed to consider such reply/ response filed by the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law.
6. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned notices / orders at Annexures -A1 to A10 issued / passed by the 1[st] respondent are hereby set aside.
NC: 2025:KHC:15971
(iii) The matter is remitted back to the 1[st] respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 25.02.2024.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, responses, pleadings, documents, etc., to the 1[st]respondent, who shall consider the same and provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law.
(v) All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
kcm/SRL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.