Wp/7774/2024 Of Hemnath Pushparaj v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
27 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/7774/2024 Of Hemnath Pushparaj v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/7774/2024 Of Hemnath Pushparaj v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byARUNKUMAR M SLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
-WRIT PETITION NO.7774 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
HEMNATH PUSHPARAJ S/O PUSHPARAJ AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT: G8 PEARL CORONET APARTMENT, 5 MAIN, SUDDAGUNTEPALYA, CV RAMAN NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 093.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER NON CORP WARD 17(6), BSNL TOWER NO.16, GREAM'S ROAD, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU - 600 006. NON CORP WARD 17(6), BSNL TOWER NO.16, GREAM'S ROAD, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU - 600 006.
2. ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTNAT
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI, II FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI, II FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER UNDER SECTION 148A(b) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 23.03.2022 IN DIN AND NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)2021-22/1041339895(1) VIDE ANNEXURE-A ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 02.04.2022 IN DIN AND NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042443225(1) VIDE ANNEXURE-C BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AS WELL AS NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT IN DIN AND NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/S/148.1/2022-23/1042567359(1) VIDE ANNEXURE-D BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“i. Quash and set-aside the impugned notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act dated 23.03.2022 in DIN and Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)2021-22/1041339895(1) by the respondent No.1 vide Annexure-A; order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act dated 02.04.2022 in DIN and Notice NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042443225(1) vide Annexure-C by the respondent No.1 as well as Notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act dated 23.03.2022 in DIN and Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)2021-22/1041339895(1) by the respondent No.1 vide Annexure-A; order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act dated 02.04.2022 in DIN and Notice NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042443225(1) vide Annexure-C by the respondent No.1 as well as Notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated
06.04.2022 vide Annexure-D by the respondent No.1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16; and
ii.
Issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the Petitioner's case and after examining the legality and validity thereof be pleased to quash and set-aside the impugned order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 24.01.2024 in DIN and Order No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1060081709(1) vide
Annexure-W by the respondent No.2 as well as notice of demand issued under section 156 of the Act dated 24.01.2024 in DIN and Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1060081854(1) vide Annexure-X for the Assessment Year 2015-16 by the respondent No.2."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
ii.
Issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records of the Petitioner's case and after examining the legality and validity thereof be pleased to quash and set-aside the impugned order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 24.01.2024 in DIN and Order No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1060081709(1) vide
Annexure-W by the respondent No.2 as well as notice of demand issued under section 156 of the Act dated 24.01.2024 in DIN and Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1060081854(1) vide Annexure-X for the Assessment Year 2015-16 by the respondent No.2."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, though the petitioner had replied/responded to the notice issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), dated 23.03.2022 along with supporting documents, the respondents have not considered the said reply/response by stating that the Assessee has failed to reply to the Notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to reply to the said
NC: 2025:KHC:13172
notice once again by setting aside the impugned orders and notices passed/issued consequent to the notice dated 23.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that, it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has submitted his reply/response along with documents to the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act and the respondent No.1 has not considered the reply filed by the petitioner. Under these circumstances, by adopting a justice oriented approach and in order to provide one more opportunity to the petitioner to give his reply to the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act, I deem it just and appropriate to set-aside the impugned order/notice issued consequent to the notice issued under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and remit the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law.
6. In the result, pass the following:
O R D E R
(i) The petition is hereby allowed;
(ii) Impugned Order at Annexure-C dated 02.04.2022; Notice at Annexure-D dated 06.04.2022; Demand Notice at Annexure-X dated 24.01.2024 and Assessment Order at Annexure-W dated 24.01.2024 are hereby set aside; 02.04.2022; Notice at Annexure-D dated 06.04.2022; Demand Notice at Annexure-X dated 24.01.2024 and Assessment Order at Annexure-W dated 24.01.2024 are hereby set aside;
(iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to the Show Cause Notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure–A dated 23.03.2022. for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to the Show Cause Notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure–A dated 23.03.2022.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent No.1, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law. to submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent No.1, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law.
SD/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.