Case LawHigh Court › Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner...

Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1) Kolkata & Ors

High Court 03 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1) Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
03 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Deepak Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1) Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

26.09.2025 Item Nos. AD-1 Saswata Department WPA 14218 of 2024 Deepak Agarwal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1) Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder Mr. K. Roy Ms. Sreeja Mukherjee …For the petitioner Mr. Aryak Dutt Mr. Amit Sharma …For the Income Tax authorities 1.It appears that in the judgment dated 3[rd]September 2025 in the third line of the third paragraph the name of the sanction granting authority has been wrongly recorded as CIT, Kolkata-II in place of CCIT, Kolkata – 2. Let the same be corrected accordingly. September 2025 in the third line of the third paragraph the name of the sanction granting authority has been wrongly recorded as CIT, Kolkata-II in place of CCIT, Kolkata – 2. Let the same be corrected accordingly. 2.Similarly, in the third line of the 5[th] paragraph Section 148A(b) has wrongly been recorded as Section 148A(d). Let the same be also corrected. Section 148A(b) has wrongly been recorded as Section 148A(d). Let the same be also corrected. 3.In the cause title of the writ petition, the writ petition number has been wrongly typed as WPA 14218 of 2025 instead and in place of WPA 14218 petition number has been wrongly typed as WPA 14218 of 2025 instead and in place of WPA 14218 of 2024. Let the same be corrected. 4.The department is directed to act accordingly. 5.Other portions of the judgment dated 3[rd] September 2025 remain unaltered. 2025 remain unaltered. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan