Quality Multimart Private Limited, Having Address At D v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur
High Court
30 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Quality Multimart Private Limited, Having Address At D v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur
Date of order
30 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Quality Multimart Private Limited, Having Address At D v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 7.The writ petition is allowed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
[2025:RJ-JP:4215-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15348/2022
Quality Multimart Private Limited, Having Address At D-29,Shanti Path, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur In The State Of Rajasthan-302016 Thorugh Its Authorized Signatory Ravi Mathur
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur Having Its Address AtSidhnath Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar Scheme, Lal Kothi Scheme,Behind New Vidhansabha, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302015.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shankar Lal PoddarFor Respondent(s): Mr.Sandeep PathakMs.Jaya P. Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
30/01/2025
Order
1.This petition is filed raising a grievance that the notice underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) hasbeen issued without proper compliance of the proceedings laiddown under Section 148A of the Act.
2.The short grievance raised is that when the notice issuedunder Section 148A(b) of the Act, the summary of the informationalong-with the relevant portion was not supplied, as per theguidelines dated 01.06.2022 issued by the Department forissuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act.
3.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the noticeunder Section 148A(b) along-with Annexure-A specifying thereasons was issued.
4.Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
5.From perusal of the pleadings, it is forthcoming that thoughthe reasons were supplied along-with the notice issued underSection 148A(b) but the summary of the material and the relevantportion was not supplied. The issue involved in the presentpetition has already been decided by this Court in DBCWPNo.14414/2022 (R.K. Buildcreations Private Limited Vs.
The Income Tax Officer) dated 08.02.2024, wherein thereliance was placed upon provisions of Section 148A as well as theguidelines issued by the Department.
6.The order under Section 148A(d) of the Act is quashed andthe matter is remitted back to the respondent to proceed inaccordance with law, after supplying the information ascontemplated in the guidelines issued by the Department.
7.The writ petition is allowed accordingly.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/24
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.