Amol Ramrao Dahaleversusthe Principal Chief Commissioner, Income Taxand Another v. Ghuge &R.m. Joshi, Jj
High Court
01 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Amol Ramrao Dahaleversusthe Principal Chief Commissioner, Income Taxand Another v. Ghuge &R.m. Joshi, Jj
Date of order
01 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018, 2017-18
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amol Ramrao Dahaleversusthe Principal Chief Commissioner, Income Taxand Another v. Ghuge &R.m. Joshi, Jj, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 148 of the Income TaxAct, for the assessment year 2017-2018 maykindly quash and set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
*1*
906y 10059o22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10059 OF 2022
AMOL RAMRAO DAHALEVERSUSTHE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAXAND ANOTHER.
…
Shri Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for the Petitioner.Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Respondents/ ITDepartment.
...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 01[st] March, 2024
Per Court :-
1.The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses C and D
as under:-
“C)By issuing appropriate writ or direction like innature the impugned notice dated 30.05.2022 u/Section 148-A(b) of Income Tax Act and orderdated 29.07.2022 passed u/Section 148A(d) ofIncome Tax Act and consequential notice dated29.07.2022 issued u/sec. 148 of the Income TaxAct, for the assessment year 2017-2018 maykindly quash and set aside.nature the impugned notice dated 30.05.2022 u/Section 148-A(b) of Income Tax Act and orderdated 29.07.2022 passed u/Section 148A(d) ofIncome Tax Act and consequential notice dated29.07.2022 issued u/sec. 148 of the Income TaxAct, for the assessment year 2017-2018 maykindly quash and set aside.
D)To hold and declare that show cause noticedated 30.05.2022 U/Section 148-A(b) andimpugned notice dated 29.07.2022 issuedU/Section 148 of Income Tax Act is timedated 30.05.2022 U/Section 148-A(b) andimpugned notice dated 29.07.2022 issuedU/Section 148 of Income Tax Act is time
*2*
906y 10059o22
barred in view of Section 149 (1)(b) of IncomeTax Act, 1961 and therefore, initiation ofreopening proceeding for the assessment year2017-18 is without jurisdiction.”
2.The only issue raised in this Petition is as regards
the escaped assessment of an amount, which is less thanRs.50,00,000/- (Fifty Lakh). As regards the issuance of a noticefor reassessment or re-computation under Section 147 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, the notice was issued under Section 148of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3.The Petitioner had filed the income tax returns forthe Assessment Year 2017-2018. Hence, the grievance of thePetitioner is that the notice under Section 148 cannot be issued inthe light of Section 149(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, withreference to the escaped assessment, if the notice is issuedbeyond three years of the Assessment Year and if the amount isless than Rs.50,00,000/- (Fifty Lakhs). A notice in peculiarcircumstances could be issued even within ten years, providedthe escaped income has to be more than Rs.50,00,000/- (FiftyLakhs).
4.This issue is no longer res-integra and as theDepartment, despite the vehement submissions of the learned
*3*
906y 10059o22
Advocate Shri Sharma, is unable to indicate from the record thatthe impugned notice was issued within three years and that theamount of escaped assessment was more than Rs.50,00,000/-.5.The Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayerClause ‘C’.
kps(R.M. JOSHI, J. )
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.