Anjna Mahajan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(1), Delhi
High Court
27 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Anjna Mahajan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(1), Delhi
Date of order
27 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Anjna Mahajan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(1), Delhi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2885/2023
ANJNA MAHAJAN
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 25(1), DELHI
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel along with Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Standing Counsels and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 27.02.2024
1.This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following
reliefs:-
“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or writ of mandamus or appropriate writ, direction or order –
i. setting aside and quash the impugned order bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/ COM/F/17/2022-23/ 1044024934(1) dated 23.07.2022 passed by the Respondent in the case of assessee under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18;
ii. setting aside and quash the proceedings initiated pursuant to the aforesaid order under Section 148A(d), including but not limited to the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 bearing DIN & notice no. ITBA/ AST/ M/ 148_1/ 2022-23/ 1044025982(1) dated
23.07.2022 issued by the Respondent in the case of assessee company for the Assessment Year 2017-18;
iii. directing the Respondent to not to initiate any proceedings based on the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act bearing DIN & Order No. ITBA/ COM/ F/17/ 2022-23/ 1044024934(1) dated 23.07.2022 for the AY 2017-18;
b) pass any other Order that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of equity, justice and fair play.”
2.Learned counsels for parties are ad idem that the issue which stands raised herein has been answered in favour of the writ petitioner in light of the decision rendered by the Court in Twylight Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 25(3) Delhi & Ors. [2024 SCC OnLine Del 330].
3.We, accordingly, allow the instant writ petition and set aside the impugned notice dated 23 July 2022 referable to Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1962, subject to liberty reserved in terms of paragraphs 28 to 30 of Twylight Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
FEBRUARY 27, 2024/RW
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.