Anup Kumar Lakhotia v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Anup Kumar Lakhotia v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Anup Kumar Lakhotia v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
10.04.2024 Sl no. 6-10
Ct no. 2 P.M.
WPA 5315 OF 2023
Anup Kumar Lakhotia. - Vs -
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle 3(2), Kolkata & Anr.
+
WPA 5321 OF 2023
+
WPA 7018 OF 2023
+ WPA 7032 OF 2023 + WPA 7457 OF 2023
Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Mr. T. A. Khan
.... for the petitioners
Mr. Samarjit Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Om Narayan Rai
... for the respondents
In all these writ petitions subject matter of challenge by the petitioners are the impugned notices issued on or after 1[st] April, 2021 under Section 148(Old) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by converting or treating the same under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act inserted by Finance Act, 2021 which came into effect from 1[st] April, 2021 and all subsequent proceedings thereunder relating to assessment year 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 on the ground that the same are barred by limitation and in support of their contention petitioners relied on an
unreported common judgement of this Court in a batch of matters dated 9[th] February, 2024 in WPO No. 2747 of 2022 (M/s. Arati Marketing Pvt. Ltd – Vs. Union of India & Ors.).
For the reasons recorded in detail in the aforesaid judgement of this Court, dated 9[th]February, 2024 and following the same, all these writ petitions are disposed of by allowing the same and by quashing the impugned notices under Section 148(Old)/148A(b) of the Act and all subsequent proceedings.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.