Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Manmohan Krishan Bagla Son Of Giriraj Das Bagla, Havingaddress At C
High Court
05 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Manmohan Krishan Bagla Son Of Giriraj Das Bagla, Havingaddress At C
Date of order
05 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Manmohan Krishan Bagla Son Of Giriraj Das Bagla, Havingaddress At C, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 469/2022
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, JaipurHaving His Address At New Central Revenue Building, BhagwanDas Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur 302005
----Appellant
Versus
Manmohan Krishan Bagla Son Of Giriraj Das Bagla, HavingAddress At C-10, Bal Marg, Opposite Tilak Park, Tilak Nagar,Jaipur In The State Of Rajasthan-302004.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna withMs. Kriti Kalawatiya For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
05/03/2024
As per office report, service of notice on sole respondent isstill awaited and learned counsel for appellant would fairly submitthat this appeal may be disposed of in terms of the decision of theHon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. vs.Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022) and batch ofappeals.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this appeal is alsodisposed of in terms of order passed by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in the case of Union of India V/s Ashish Agarwal (supra). Tomake it clear, we affirm the order passed by learned Single Judgethat without recourse to Section 148A of IT Act, notice underSection 148 could not be issued. That is now required to be
treated as notice under Section 148A as per decision in the case ofUnion of India V/s Union of India V/s Ashish Agarwal (supra).
The liberty to the department, however, would be available interms of order passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case ofUnion of India V/s Ashish Agarwal (supra).
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
PAYAL DHAWAN /38
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.