Case LawHigh Court › Bhuri Devi v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd...

Bhuri Devi v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd 7(2), Jaipur

High Court 09 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Bhuri Devi v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd 7(2), Jaipur
Date of order
09 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bhuri Devi v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd 7(2), Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to takeremedy available under the law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19285/2023 Bhuri Devi, W/o. Shri Narayan Lal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o.Village Gopal Nagar, Tehsil-Phagi, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd 7(2), Jaipur Having Its Address AtNew Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan - 302001. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Malani Advocate. For Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak Advocate with Ms. Jaya P. Pathak Advocate. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTAOrder 09/01/2024 1.Though number of issues are raised in this petition, we findthat the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act waspassed way-back on 22.07.2022. The petitioner did not choose tochallenge this order. Finally assessment order has also been passedon 25.05.2023. This petition has been filed thereafter. 2.In the aforesaid circumstances, when the petitioner did nottake any remedy to challenge the order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Income Tax Act when it was passed on 22.07.2022, we are notinclined to exercise our discretion under Article 226 of theConstitution of India to interfere with the order as the petitioner hasan alternative and efficacious statutory remedy. All the issues areleft open for being considered in the appeal that may be filed by thepetitioner. 3.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to takeremedy available under the law. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT-185
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan