Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 1(1)(2), New Delhi
High Court
06 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 1(1)(2), New Delhi
Date of order
06 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 1(1)(2), New Delhi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 5863/2023 & CM APPL. 23010/2023 (stay)
BLACKSTONE CAPITAL PARTNERS (SINGAPORE) VI FDI THREE PTE LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Kalra, Adv.
%
versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(1)(2), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Sr.SC with
Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya, Jr.SC along with Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
06.03.2024
1.Having heard Mr. Kaka, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, we find that the challenge which is raised here stands answered in favour of the writ petitioner in light of the judgment rendered by the Court in M/s Angelantoni Test Technologies SRL vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1(1)(1) &
Ors. [2023 SCC OnLine Del 8488].
2.InM/s Angelantoni Test Technologies, this Court had held that investment in shares would amount to a “capital account transaction” and does not constitute “income” for the purposes of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”].
3.In view of the aforesaid, we allow the instant writ petition and quash the impugned notices dated 25 June 2021 and 31 May 2022 issued under Sections 148 and 148A(b) of the Act, respectively as also the order dated 31 March 2023 issued under Section 148A(d) of the Act and other consequential proceedings.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MARCH 06, 2024/p
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.