Brightmoon Supply Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1) And Ors
High Court
23 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Brightmoon Supply Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1) And Ors
Date of order
23 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Brightmoon Supply Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1) And Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the discussion made above, this writ petition being WPO2927 of 2022 is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD –11
ORDER SHEET
WPO/2927/2022IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
BRIGHTMOON SUPPLY PRIVATE LIMITEDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1) AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 23[rd]November, 2022.
Appearance:Ms. Arati Agarwal, Adv.Ms. Rosy Banerjee, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Tilok Mitra, Adv.…For the Revenue
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 29[th] July, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961and subsequent notice under Section 148 of the Act relating to assessmentyear 2015-16 based on the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated25[th] May, 2022. The petitioner has participated in the proceeding and I haveperused the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act. It is not acase which falls within the category of those cases where the proceeding iswithout jurisdiction on the face of it or there is violation of principles ofnatural justice in the matter and furthermore the impugned order underSection 148A(d) is not the final assessment order and neither it is a demandand petitioner still has a scope of making out the case during the proceedingsubsequent to Section 148 notice for dropping the case under Section 147of the Act.
In view of the discussion made above, this writ petition being WPO2927 of 2022 is dismissed.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.