Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii,...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Sonal Tie-Up Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 Nov 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Sonal Tie-Up Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Sonal Tie-Up Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

OD-16 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/92/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III, KOLKATA VS. M/S. SONAL TIE-UP PVT. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 3[rd ]November, 2022 Appearance : Mr. Aryak Dutt, Adv.. …for appellant. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 30[th] September, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘A’ Bench, Kolkata In ITA No.827/Kol/209 for the assessment year 2005-06. The appeal was admitted on 21[st] February, 2011 on the following substantial question of law: “Whether the Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in cancelling the order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax by wrongly holding that Explanation to Section 73 of the Act did not apply?” We have heard Mr. Aryak Dutt, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue. As could be seen from the assessment order, the total taxable income was computed to be only Rs.31,110/-. If that be so, the tax effect in this appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed by the CBDT and, therefore, the appellant/revenue is disentitled from pursuing this appeal further. In the light of the above, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. Consequently, the substantial question of law is left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Pal/SN
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan