EaseValue Act 2025Forms Case LawServices 💬 Ask our CA
Case Law › Section 73
Income-tax Act · Case Law

Section 73 Income Tax Case Law — Speculation Losses

Browse 161 Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court judgments that deal with Section 73 (Speculation Losses) of the Income-tax Act. Each ruling shows the parties, citation, court, year and who it went in favour of — with the full order text. Use them to understand how Section 73 has been interpreted and to support a notice reply, appeal or assessment.

Got a Section 73 notice or dispute?

Our CA-led litigation team drafts replies and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) citing the right precedents.

Get expert help →

Judgments on Section 73 (showing 161 of 161)

Snowtex Investment Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2, Kolkata
Supreme Court · 2019 · [2019] 8 S.C.R. 687 · Dismissed
Revenue
Seshasayee Paper & Boards Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Supreme Court · 2015 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 1054 · Dismissed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thiruvananthapuram v. Joseph Valakuzhy
Supreme Court · 2008 · [2008] 7 S.C.R. 752 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gujarat Maritime Board
Supreme Court · 2007 · [2007] 12 S.C.R. 962 · Dismissed
Assessee
Karnataka Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bangalore
Supreme Court · 2002 · [2002] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 453 · Dismissed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahendra Mills
Supreme Court · 2000 · [2000] 2 S.C.R. 465 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax, U.p. v. Shah Sadiq And Sons.
Supreme Court · 1987 · [1987] 2 S.C.R. 942 · Dismissed
Assessee
H. D. Devasia & Co., Kerala v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala
Supreme Court · 1979 · [1979] 3 S.C.R. 1271 · Dismissed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata -Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Madanlal Limited
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Assessee
Counsel Forthe Petitioner: Srl. C v. Narasimham
High Court · 2025 · Allowed
—
The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, 1(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Raipur Development Authority, Bajrang Market, G.e. Road, Raipur,Chhattisgarh
High Court · 2025 · Dismissed
Assessee
Pmv Maltings Pvt Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 19(1) & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Pmv Maltings Pvt Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 19(1) & Anr
High Court · 2025 · Other
—
Wpc/4395/2024 Of M/S Rewinder Techno Electricals Through Its One Of The Partners Sanjay Gupta v. Union Of India Through The Principal Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Taxes And Central Excise, Ranchi Having Its Office At 5-A, Income Tax Building, Main Road, Ranchi, P.o. And P.s.- Hindpiri
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. West Bengal Fisheries Corporation Ltd
High Court · 2024 · Allowed
Revenue
Emec Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Kolkata
High Court · 2024 · Allowed
Assessee
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About 63Years, Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara, Districtbanswara At Present Residing At Near Income Tax Office,Udaipur Road, Banswara, Raja v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Sh. Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About63 Years, R/O Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara,District Banswara, At Present Residing At Near Income Taxoffice, Udaipur Road, Bansw v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About 63Years, Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara, Districtbanswara At Present Residing At Near Income Tax Office,Udaipur Road, Banswara, Raja v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About 63Years, R/O Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara, Districtbanswara At Present Residing At Near Income Tax Office,Udaipur Road, Banswara, v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Sh. Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About63 Years, R/O Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara,District Banswara At Present Residing At Near Income Tax Office,Udaipur Road, Banswa v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Laxmi Kant Agarwal S/O Banarasi Lal Agarwal, Aged About 63Years, Shri Ram Colony, Banswara, Tehsil Banswara, Districtbanswara At Present Residing At Near Income Tax Office,Udaipur Road, Banswara, Raja v. Divisional Commissioner, Banswara
High Court · 2024 · Other
—
Itxa/807/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. Nilkanth Tech Park Pvt. Ltd.
High Court · 2023 · Dismissed
Assessee
M/S Lnv Technology Private Ltd.,Rep. By Its Director V.chandrasekhara Rao,18/3, Sigapi Achi Building,5[Th] Floor, Rukmanilakshmipathi Salai,Egmore, Chennai 600 008.Pan: Aaacl 6394H v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 4(1), Chennai Income Tax Department Room No.428, 4[Th] Floor, Main Building
High Court · 2023 · Allowed
Assessee
Patna High Court Cwjc No.9032 Of 2023 Dt.08-08-2023 v. Commissionerof Income Tax, Kolkata-I, (2012) 11 Scc 316 To Urge That Nopenalty Would Be Leviable In The Facts And Circumstances Of Thecase
High Court · 2023 · Dismissed
Revenue
Ita/142/2011 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-1 v. M/S. Ashdil Sales Promotion Private Limited
High Court · 2023 · Dismissed
Assessee
Follows v. Cit 255 Itr 273 (Sc). We,Therefore, Find No Merit In The Submission Of Theassessee And Uphold The Order Ofthe Ld. Cit [A
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Assessee
Wp/16692/2022 Of Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Sonal Tie-Up Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Assessee
Itat/223/2003 M/S. Banmila Commotrade Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Kolkata & Anr
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Revenue
Dolaria Enterprises Private Limited v. Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia
High Court · 2022 · Other
—
Itat/184/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax , Kol - Iii, Kol v. M/S. Meenakshi Tea Co. Ltd
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Assessee
Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd.shop No. 1, Animesh Apartment,Plot No. 3, Janki Nagar,Wadibhokar Road, Deopur,Dhule-424 002 v. The Union Of Indiathrough Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Dhule
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Assessee
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 4(1), Room No.430, Main Building, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 v. Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices/
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Assessee
Itxa/95/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2 v. Sharekhan Ltd.
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Assessee
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. Apex Enterprises (I) Limited
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Revenue
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. Apex Enterprises (I) Limited
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Revenue
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Kolkata – 2, Kolkata v. M/S. K.b. Capital Markets Pvt. Limited
High Court · 2022 · Allowed
Revenue
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Feegrade & Company Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2022 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-2, Kolkata v. Kalyanpur Cements Ltd
High Court · 2021 · Other
—
Ita/273/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Electronics And Controls
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
Assessee
Ita/27/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Has Finally Passed An Order On 30.3.2015 Against The Assessee And Thereafter, An Appeal Was Preferred Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Income Tax
High Court · 2021 · Allowed
—
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi v. Hosmani
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
—
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi v. Hosmani
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
—
M/S.gee Gee Holdings Chennai Pvt. Ltd., Old No.31, New No.6, Dr.radhakrishnan Salai 9[Th] Street, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004 v. The Income Tax Officer, Company Ward – Ii (1), Chennai
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
Revenue
Ita 168/2019 v. Cit (60 Itr 52), Has Upheld The Decision Of The Cita And Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Revenue And The Revenue Is Before This Court In The Present Appeal
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
Revenue
Ita/138/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Quest Global Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.,
High Court · 2021 · Allowed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madurai v. Tuticorin Port Trust, Harbour Estate, Tuticorin
High Court · 2021 · Dismissed
Assessee
The Hon'ble Dr.justice Vineet Kothari v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2020 · Allowed
Assessee
Start Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. > Picture [373 X 16] Intentionally Omitted <==
High Court · 2020 · Dismissed
—
Travel Designer India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2019 · Allowed
Assessee
Sca/13924/2018 Of Kunal Structure (India) Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1)(2)
High Court · 2019 · Allowed
Assessee
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Coimbatore-18 v. M/S.cotton Blossom (India) P. Ltd.,Tirupur-641606
High Court · 2019 · Dismissed
Assessee
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.aishwarya & Co. P. Ltd., Chennai-1
High Court · 2019 · Dismissed
Assessee
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Magic Share Traders Ltd
High Court · 2019 · Allowed
Revenue
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Mumbai v. M/S.envision Investment & Finance P. Ltd
High Court · 2019 · Dismissed
Assessee
Ita/1231/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, v. Harrisons Malayalam Financial Services Ltd.,
High Court · 2019 · Allowed
Revenue
Appel v. M/S Max India Limited
High Court · 2019 · Dismissed
—
Itxa/1534/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/. Atos India Pvt Ltd
High Court · 2019 · Allowed
Revenue
Ita No.51/2009 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Calcutta] ?_
High Court · 2018 · Dismissed
Revenue
The Learned Counsel On Either Side Do Not Dispute The Fact That Substantial Question Of Law No.1 Has Been Answered By The Hon'ble Supreme Court In Favour Of The Assessee In The Case Of Guffic Chem (P) v. Thus, Following The Said Decisions Of The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Both
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
—
Tca/143/2009 Of M/S Jaidayal Prannath Kapur v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court · 2018 · Other
—
Section 115Jb Is Akin To Section 115Jaof The Act; As Held By The Honourable Supremecourt In 2010 (327) Itr 305(Sc) [Ajanta Pharmalimited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax]. It Wasdeclared That Section 115Ja And The Successorsection 115Jb Are Self-Contained Codes Theapplication Of Which Is Notwithstanding Anyprovisions In The Act
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Assessee
Section 115Jb Is Akin To Section 115Jaof The Act; As Held By The Honourable Supremecourt In 2010 (327) Itr 305(Sc) [Ajanta Pharmalimited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax]. It Wasdeclared That Section 115Ja And The Successorsection 115Jb Are Self-Contained Codes Theapplication Of Which Is Notwithstanding Anyprovisions In The Act
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Assessee
Section 115Jb Is Akin To Section 115Jaof The Act; As Held By The Honourable Supremecourt In 2010 (327) Itr 305(Sc) [Ajanta Pharmalimited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax]. It Wasdeclared That Section 115Ja And The Successorsection 115Jb Are Self-Contained Codes Theapplication Of Which Is Notwithstanding Anyprovisions In The Act
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Assessee
Section 115Jb Is Akin To Section 115Jaof The Act; As Held By The Honourable Supremecourt In 2010 (327) Itr 305(Sc) [Ajanta Pharmalimited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax]. It Wasdeclared That Section 115Ja And The Successorsection 115Jb Are Self-Contained Codes Theapplication Of Which Is Notwithstanding Anyprovisions In The Act
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Assessee
Section 115Jb Is Akin To Section 115Jaof The Act; As Held By The Honourable Supremecourt In 2010 (327) Itr 305(Sc) [Ajanta Pharmalimited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax]. It Wasdeclared That Section 115Ja And The Successorsection 115Jb Are Self-Contained Codes Theapplication Of Which Is Notwithstanding Anyprovisions In The Act
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Assessee
Bishnu Krishna Shrestha, S/O Late Shri Ganesh Chandshrestha , 34, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar-1, South Westdelhishrestha , 34, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar-1, South Westdelhi v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals-Iii, Jaipur , Havinghis Office At Statue Circle, Bhagwan Das Road, Cscheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001His Office At Statue Circle, Bhagwan Das Road, Cscheme, Jaipur, R
High Court · 2018 · Dismissed
Revenue
Whereas The Assessing Officer Held That The Assessee Was Hitby The Explanation To Section 73 Of The Act, The Cit(Appeals)Held Otherwise. Referring To The Orders Of The Tribunal Reportedin Shree Swamy v. Th] Ito (32 Itd806)And Himalaya Co. Ltd. Vs. Cit(30 Itd 139)(Cal.), Heaccepted The Assessee's Contention And Held That It Was Aninvestment Company
High Court · 2018 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), New Central Revenuebuilding Statue Circle, Jaipur Raj v. Shri Prakash Chand Jain, 305 Jaipur Tower 3Rd Floor, M.i. Road,Jaipur Raj
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sri Vasavi Gold & Bullion Pvt. Ltd., 137, Nsc Bose Road Sowcarpet, Chennai - 600 079
High Court · 2018 · Allowed
Revenue
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. British Motor Car Co. (1934) Ltd
High Court · 2018 · Dismissed
Assessee
The First Issue Is Covered By The Decision Of The Division Bench Of This Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Hence, No Substantial Question Law Arises. Appeal Is Dismissed
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
Assessee
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,New Central Revenue Building, Statute Circle, Jaipur (Raj v. M/S Eastern Jewels Pvt Ltd., 507, Mahar Bhavan, Thakur Pachwar Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazaar, Jaipur
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur(Raj v. Shri Prakash Chand Jain, 305, Jaipur Tower, 3Rd Floor, M.i. Road, Jaipur
High Court · 2017 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. M/S Allen Career Institute, C-210/2, Talwandi, Kota
High Court · 2017 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S. Bhargava Lodha Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., S-11, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur (Raj v. M/S Om Metals Infraprojects Ltd., Om Tower, M.i. Road, Church Road, Jaipur. Pan: Aaaco8245J
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
Assessee
M/S. Idfc Sski Securities Pvt. Ltd v. Gangapurwala Anda. M. Badar, Jj
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
—
M/S. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, Daga Complex, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur
High Court · 2017 · Allowed
Assessee
The Other Judgment Relied Upon By Appellant Is In Case Of Prasad Agents (P) Ltd v. Itr-43 (Bom
High Court · 2017 · Dismissed
—
The Impugned Order Allowed The Respondent Assessee's Appeal On The Above Issue By Following The Decision Of This Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Lokmat Newspapers (P) Ltd. 322 Itr 43. In The Above View, The Question As Formulated Herein Does Not Give Rise To Any Substantial Question Of Law. Thus, Not Entertained
High Court · 2016 · Allowed
Revenue
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-09 v. W.g. Share Broking Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2016 · Dismissed
Assessee
Itxa-2368.13.Doc v. Cit 255 Itr 273 Rendered On 2[Nd] May, 2002. However, The Assessing Officer Held
High Court · 2016 · Dismissed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.anush Shares And Securities Pvt Ltd., New No.39, Old No.9, 1[St] Floor Greenways Road, Ra.puram, Chennai
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.shriram Investment Ltd.,No.4 Lady Desikachari Road,Chennai - 600 004
High Court · 2015 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Revenue
Income Tax Appeal No. 83/2013.The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. M/S. Shree Datta Fertilizers And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Amravati
High Court · 2015 · Dismissed
Assessee
Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2015 · Dismissed
Revenue
Thermal Nagar, Tuticorin v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - I(1), Tuticorin
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Lalit Kumar Poddar
High Court · 2015 · Allowed
Revenue
Itta/47/2004 Of Km/S. Melville Finest Ltd., v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2014 · Dismissed
Revenue
Swojas Investment Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax....opponent(S
High Court · 2014 · Allowed
Assessee
Itta/100/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax[[1]] ~~.~~
High Court · 2014 · Dismissed
—
Ita/829/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S First Securities Pvt Ltd
High Court · 2014 · Allowed
Revenue
Ausom Enterprises Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Or His Sucessor To Office & 1
High Court · 2014 · Allowed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Ashley Services Limited,No.1, Sardar Patel Road,Guindy, Chennai – 32
High Court · 2014 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. Itegra Engineering India Ltd
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Revenue
Kulwant Singh v. Controller Of Estate Duty-Cum-Commissionerof Income Tax, Jalandhar And Another
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sam Global Securities Ltd
High Court · 2013 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Surat Beverages Ltd....opponent(S
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Surat Beverages Ltd....opponent(S
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S Karjat Trade Place (P) Ltd
High Court · 2013 · Other
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-Iv v. Dlf Commercial Developers Limited
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax: Delhi-Viii v. Ashok Mittal
High Court · 2013 · Allowed
Revenue
Concealment Of Particulars Of Income The Part Of The Respondent Assessee. The Tribunal Held That Application Of Section 73 Of The v. We Find No Fault With The Impugned Order Of The
High Court · 2013 · Dismissed
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rbg Investment & Finance Ltd
High Court · 2012 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vachanband Investment Ltd
High Court · 2012 · Allowed
Revenue
Ita/792/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vesesh Infotechnics Limitedd
High Court · 2012 · Allowed
Revenue
Shri Uday Punj v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii, New Delhi
High Court · 2012 · Dismissed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 v. M/S. Darshan Securities Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2012 · Dismissed
Assessee
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Bombay Foods Pvt Ltd, 53-57 Laxmi
High Court · 2012 · Allowed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam v. $ M/S.vijayawada Bottling Co., Limited,Vijayawada
High Court · 2012 · Other
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam v. $ M/S.vijayawada Bottling Co., Limited,Vijayawada
High Court · 2012 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Tracstar Investment Ltd
High Court · 2011 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Tracstar Investment Ltd
High Court · 2011 · Dismissed
Assessee
Ita/86/2011 Of M/S.prima Agro Ltd., v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ernakulam
High Court · 2011 · Allowed
Assessee
As Regards The First Questions Is Concerned, Counsel For The Parties State That Said Question Stands Answered Against The Revenue By The Decision Of This Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income Ta v. Lokmat Newspaper (P.) Ltd. Reported In 322 Itr 43. Hence, The First Question Cannot Be Entertained
High Court · 2011 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax (In All Cases v. M/S.kriti Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (In All Cases
High Court · 2011 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Malladi Project Management Centre Pvt. Ltd., 52 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Ekkaduthangal, Chennai – 600 097
High Court · 2011 · Allowed
Revenue
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Narayan Securities Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2011 · Other
—
As Regards The First Question, Learned Counsel For The Parties State That The Said Question Is Covered Against The Assessee By The Decision Of This Court In The Case Cit v. The Appeal Is Disposed Of Accordingly. No Order As To Costs
High Court · 2011 · Other
—
Itxa/1539/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central Iv Mumbai v. Bharat R. Ruia Huf
High Court · 2011 · Other
—
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Govind Nagar Sugar Limited ……
High Court · 2011 · Allowed
Revenue
Itxa/4008/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 Mumbi v. M/S. Ranjit Holding P Ltd
High Court · 2011 · Allowed
Revenue
M/S Aravali Engineers (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another
High Court · 2010 · Allowed
Assessee
Reliance Is Also Placed On The Decision Of The M.p. High Court In Thematter Of C.i.t v. Intermetal Trade Ltd
High Court · 2010 · Allowed
—
Taxc/105/2010 Of Deputy Commi. Of Income Tax,Bhilai v. M/S Univeb Sleepers Pvt.ltd.
High Court · 2010 · Allowed
Revenue
Ita/122/2001 Of The Commr. Of Income Tax, Coimbatore v. The Periakaramalai Tea & Produce Co. Ltd
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jubilant Enpro Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Advocate v. Front Line Securities Limited
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
Counsel Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue States That The Issues Raised In The Appeal Would Stand Covered Against The Revenue By The Judgment Of The Division Bench Of This Court Dated 16 February 201 v. There Shall Be No Order As To Costs
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
M/S Porrits & Spencer (Asia) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Faridabad
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
Itxa/2031/2009 Of United Nmotor India Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 7 (3)
High Court · 2010 · Allowed
Assessee
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt.ltd
High Court · 2010 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd
High Court · 2010 · Other
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Raj Soya Exports Andinvestment Ltd
High Court · 2010 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Premium Taxcons Pvt. Ltd
High Court · 2009 · Dismissed
Assessee
Itxa/923/2008 Of Sovereign Securities Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. The Income - Tax Oficer Ward -4 (2) (1), Mumbai
High Court · 2009 · Other
—
Itxa/383/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. M/S Tata Sons Ltd., Mumbai
High Court · 2009 · Dismissed
Assessee
Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd
High Court · 2009 · Dismissed
Assessee
The Cit-8 Mumbai v. M/S.vrushchik Consultancy
High Court · 2009 · Dismissed
Assessee
Nariman Point, Mumbai-20 v. Income Tax Officer 3(2)(4
High Court · 2009 · Dismissed
Revenue
Against The Order Dated 29.11.1990 Passed By Judicial Member, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna In R.a.no.32 (Pat)/1990 I.t.a.no.262 (Pat)/1989 For The Assessment Year 1984-85 v. Mr. S.k.sharan, Advocate
High Court · 2008 · Allowed
Revenue
Dabur India Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court · 2008 · Dismissed
Revenue
Income Tax Appeal No. 85 Of 2005 C I T Jodhpur v. Neha Proteins Limited
High Court · 2008 · Dismissed
Assessee
The C.i.t. Mumbai City-Vi v. Mr. P.s. Sahadevan, For The
High Court · 2008 · Allowed
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sinore Trading Ltd
High Court · 2008 · Other
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hero Textiles & Trading Ltd
High Court · 2008 · Dismissed
Assessee
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishwa Bhushan Banta
High Court · 2007 · Allowed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rishiraj Merchandise Ltd
High Court · 2007 · Other
—
The Assessee Placed Reliance On The Decision Of The Supreme Court Reported In 32 Itr 688 (United Commercial Bank Ltd v. The Revenue Preferred An Appeal To The Income Tax
High Court · 2007 · Allowed
Assessee
The Learned Standing Counsel For The Revenue Submitted That Theissue Involved In This Appeal Is Answered In Favour Of The Revenue By Thedecision Of This Court In Cit v. Fab Exports Pvt. Ltd., [2002] 258 Itr 56
High Court · 2007 · Allowed
Revenue
Wp/880/2006 Of Icici Securities Ltd. v. The Assistaant Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 (2), Mumbaia And Anr.
High Court · 2006 · Allowed
Assessee
Iii) Whether In The Facts And Circumstances Of The Case, The Tribunal Is Right In Allowing The Deduction Under Section 80M On The Dividend Received From The Units Till Date Of The Sale?" v. Wheels India Ltd., [2005] 275 Itr 319 Wherein A Division Bench Of This Court, In Which One Of Us Was A Party (P.d.dinakaran,J.), Held As Follows
High Court · 2006 · Dismissed
—
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Coimbatore v. M/S. Periyar District Co-Op. Milk Producers Union Ltd., Erode
High Court · 2004 · Allowed
Revenue
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu-Iv, Chennai v. M/S.henkel Spic India Ltd., Chennai
High Court · 2003 · Other
—
M/S.jai Bharath Tanners, Vellore v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu V, Madras
High Court · 2002 · Other
—
Whether It Is To Be Circulated To The Civil Judge? : No v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court · 2001 · Other
—

Read the bare provision: Income-tax Act 2025 → · More: all income-tax case law →

General information from public-domain judgments (via Open India Law, CC BY 4.0). Not legal advice — verify against the original order.

Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan