Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd

High Court 29 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd
Date of order
29 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2) Whether for the purpose of the Explanation to section 73, the loss on share trading should be first adjusted for computing the gross total income and only thereafter the components of income computed under different heads be considered.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2008 The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Shahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The appeals seeks to raise the following questions of law:- 1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in directing the assessing officer to compute the total income of the assessee without applying the provision of Explanation to section 73 ? 2) Whether for the purpose of the Explanation to section 73, the loss on share trading should be first adjusted for computing the gross total income and only thereafter the components of income computed under different heads be considered. 3) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in concluding that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs.1,08,444/- as bad debts ? - = : 2 : = - 2. The issue sought to be raised has already been answered by this Court in the case of C.I.T. V/s.M/s.Hiro Textiles & Trading Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.296 of 2001 decided on 29/1/2008. A photocopy of the same is produced on record. So also, the above issue is covered by the judgment in the case Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Star Chemicals(Bombay) (P) Ltd. reported in 220 CTR 319 In this Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Star Chemicals (Bombay) (P) Ltd. view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan