Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd
High Court
29 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd
Date of order
29 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/838/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2) Whether for the purpose of the Explanation to section 73, the loss on share trading should be first adjusted for computing the gross total income and only thereafter the components of income computed under different heads be considered.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2008
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Rathi Mercantile Industries Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Shahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.P.R.Toprani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The
appeals seeks to raise the following questions of
law:-
1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case, the Tribunal was justified in directing the
assessing officer to compute the total income of
the assessee without applying the provision of
Explanation to section 73 ?
2) Whether for the purpose of the Explanation to
section 73, the loss on share trading should be
first adjusted for computing the gross total
income and only thereafter the components of
income computed under different heads be
considered.
3) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case, the Tribunal was justified in concluding
that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of
Rs.1,08,444/- as bad debts ?
- = : 2 : = -
2. The issue sought to be raised has already
been answered by this Court in the case of C.I.T.
V/s.M/s.Hiro Textiles & Trading Ltd. in Income Tax
Appeal No.296 of 2001 decided on 29/1/2008. A
photocopy of the same is produced on record. So also,
the above issue is covered by the judgment in the case
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Star Chemicals(Bombay) (P) Ltd. reported in 220 CTR 319 In this
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Star Chemicals
(Bombay) (P) Ltd.
view of the matter, no substantial question of law
arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore,
dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.