Case Law › High Court › D.b. Civil Writ Petition v. Income Tax O...

D.b. Civil Writ Petition v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1), Jaipur

High Court 30 May 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

30 May 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In D.b. Civil Writ Petition v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1), Jaipur, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 148A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4.The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 148A case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6258/2022 Manglam Industries Private Limited, 524 - Alankar Plaza CentralSpine, Vidhyadhar Nagar Jaipur- 302023 (Rajasthan) ThroughIts Ex-Director Praveen Kumar Kandoi S/o. Sh. Jagdish PrasadKandoi. At Present City Star, Central Spine, Vidhyadhar Nagar,Jaipur - 302039 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I (1), Jaipur. 2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Ncrb Building,Statue Circle, JaipurStatue Circle, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): NoneFor Respondent(s): Mr.Anuroop Singhi with Mr.N.S.Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA 30/05/2025 Order 1.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the noticedated 29.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(d) of the Income TaxAct, 1961 is under challenge. 2.The petition is pending since 2022 and in the meantime re-assessment order dated 29.03.2023 was passed. A copy of theorder is taken on record. The order has not been challenged bythe assessee. 3.None has put in appearance on behalf of learned counsel forthe petitioner, similar was the position on 04.11.2023, 01.02.2024& 12.07.2024. 4.The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ANAND SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/51

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.