Case LawHigh Court › Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centr...

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Nuemen Healthcare Private Limited

High Court 14 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Nuemen Healthcare Private Limited
Date of order
14 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle v. Nuemen Healthcare Private Limited, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 478/2022 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle -1, JaipurHaving Its Address At New Central Revenue Building, BhagwanDas Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur 302005 ----Appellant Versus Nuemen Healthcare Private Limited, Having Its Address At 344,Nemi Sagar Colony, Queens Road, Jaipur 302021 Through ItsAuthorized Signatory Shri Naveen Singh Shekhawat ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna For Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 14/03/2024 1.Appellant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by order dated25.11.2021 passed by learned Single Judge. 2.It is contended by counsel for the appellant that this appealmay be disposed of in terms of the decision of the Hon’bleSupreme Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No.3005/2022)and batch of appeals. 3.In view of the aforesaid submission, this appeal is alsodisposed of in terms of order passed by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in the case of Union of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal (supra). Tomake it clear, we affirm the order passed by learned Single Judgethat without recourse to Section 148A of IT Act, notice underSection 148 could not be issued. That is now required to be treated as notice under Section 148A as per decision in the case ofUnion of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal (supra). 4.The liberty to the department, however, would be available interms of order passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case ofUnion of India Vs. Ashish Agarwal (supra). (SHUBHA MEHTA),J(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J MAHIMA/01
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan