Dobby Media Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Wardno.1(1)/11(4), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
21 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Dobby Media Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Wardno.1(1)/11(4), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
21 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dobby Media Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Wardno.1(1)/11(4), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: Theaforesaid impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theAct, in view of the fact which appears from record, isperverse and is in total non-application of mind and onthis ground alone, the aforesaid impugned order is not sustainable and is liable to be quashed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
21.03.2023. p.b.Sl. No.10.
WPA 4123 of 2023
Dobby Media Pvt. Ltd.
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, WardNo.1(1)/11`(4), Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das.
……..for the petitioner.
Mr. Vipul Kundalia,Mr. Prithu Dudhoria.
……..for income tax authority.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income TaxAct, 1961, dated 29[th] July, 2022 and all subsequentproceedings, on the ground that the aforesaid impugnedorder is perverse and in total non-application of mind byrecording that no response was given to the letter inquestion issued by the Assessing Officer nor anysupporting document was attached while it appears fromrecord at page 41 of the writ petition that petitioner hadfiled the response along with supporting documents. Theaforesaid impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theAct, in view of the fact which appears from record, isperverse and is in total non-application of mind and onthis ground alone, the aforesaid impugned order is not
sustainable and is liable to be quashed. However,quashing of the aforesaid impugned order under Section148A(d) of the Act and all subsequent proceedings, will notbe a bar on the part of the Assessing Officer to pass afresh order under Section 148A(d) of the Act afterconsidering the objection/ response of the petitioner dated15[th] June, 2022 in accordance with law and by passing areasoned and speaking order after giving an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner or his authorised representatives,within a period of eight weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order.
With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA 4123 of 2023 stands disposed of.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.