Case LawHigh Court › Ekaksh Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Of...

Ekaksh Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 08 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ekaksh Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
08 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ekaksh Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDER SHEETWPO/2522/2022IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE EKAKSH COMMERCE PVT LTDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO. 1(1) AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date: 8[th] September, 2022. Appearance:Mr. Sudhir Mehta, Adv.Mr. Anurag Bagaria, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.…for the Respondents The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 27[th] April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961,relating to assessment year 2018-19 on the ground that the same beingwithout jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of Section 149(1)(a) and(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by contending that admittedly the impugnednotice has been issued after the expiry of three years from the end ofrelevant assessment year and it is also an admitted position which appearsfrom the conclusion of the assessing officer himself in the impugned orderthat the alleged escapement of income is Rs. 36,98,550/- which is below Rs.50 lakh. Considering the submission of the parties and admitted factual andlegal position which appears on perusal of the impugned order dated 27[th]April, 2022, I am of the considered view that the aforesaid impugned order isbad and not sustainable in law and is liable to be quashed for the reasonthat the impugned notice under Section 148A(b) under the newly amended Act was issued after expiry of three years from the end of relevantassessment year and the alleged escapement of income is below Rs. 50 lakh.In view of the discussion made above, this writ petition being WPO2522 of 2022 is disposed of by quashing the aforesaid impugned order dated27[th] April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Act. TR/ (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan