Case LawHigh Court › Expandable Enterprises Private Limited v...

Expandable Enterprises Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 08 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Expandable Enterprises Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
08 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Expandable Enterprises Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

8.6.2023 ks sl. 45 ks WPA 10667 of 2023 Expandable Enterprises Private Limited VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward No.9)1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder,Ms. Megha Agarwal, Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das … For the Petitioner. Mr. Vipul Kundalia,Mr. Amit Sharma … For the Respondents. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order under Section 148A(d) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 dated 12[th] April, 2023, relating toassessment year 2019-20, which has been passedafter taking approval from “Specified Authority” on 12[th]April, 2023 and after affording opportunity of hearingto the petitioner and considering the objection/replyfiled under Section 148A(b) of the Act. What petitioneris challenging in this writ petition is not thejurisdiction of the “Specified Authority” who hasapproved rather petitioner has challenged the legalityand merits of the approval itself. On perusal of Section 151(i) and 151(ii) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 which simply says as to who willbe the “Specified Authority” for the purposes of Section148 and Section 148A of the Act and in this casejurisdiction of the “Specified Authority” who has approved for the purpose of Section 148 and 148A hasnot been challenged. In view of the discussion made above, I am notinclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly,this writ petition being WPA 10667 of 2023 isdismissed. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan