Gloster Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax , Kolkata And Ors
High Court
24 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Gloster Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax , Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
24 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Gloster Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax , Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER SHEETWPO/2607/2022IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
GLOSTER LIMITED
VSDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , KOLKATA AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Date: 24[th] November, 2022.
Appearance:Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Somak Basu, Adv.. . .for the petitioner.Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv.. . .for the respondent.
The Court: Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiawherein the petitioner company has challenged the impugned notices underSection 148A(b) dated 31[st] May, 2022 and the impugned order under Section148A(d) and consequent notice issued under Section 148 dated 28[th] July,2022 for the assessment year 2015-16.
It is submitted by Mr. J.P. Khaitan, senior advocate appearing onbehalf of the petitioner that the department wishes to assess as tax which isactually taxable under the amalgamating company Gloster Ltd. bearing PANNo. AAACG9800B. Mr. J.P. Khaitan submits that the amalgamation of GlosterLtd. bearing the above PAN number was approved with effect from 1[st] January,
2015 with Kettlewell Bullen & Co. Ltd. that has since been renamed as GlosterLtd. He further submits that by a letter dated 6[th] July, 2021 the entireposition with regard to the taxability of the amount received from theInsurance Company is taxable at the hands of the amalgamating company andnot in the hands of the amalgamated company. He accordingly submits thatby the letter dated 6[th] July, 2021 this position is made clear and theamalgamating company offered taxability of the sum of the insurance claimreceived on 19-09-2014 in the Assessment Year 2015-16 by the amalgamatingcompany.
In light of the same, the show cause notices issued upon theamalgamated company dated 19[th] April, 2021 and 31[st] May, 2022 be treatedas notices issued upon the amalgamating company bearing PAN No. .
The assessee has specifically consented in Court that they shall nottake up the point of limitation before the Assessing Officer.
Furthermore, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) andconsequent notices issued under Section 148 dated 28[th] July, 2022 arequashed and set aside.
With the above directions WPO/2607/2022 is disposed of.
Since no affidavits are exchanged the allegations are deemed to havebeen denied.
(SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.