Case LawHigh Court › Gsp Piling Constructions Private Limited...

Gsp Piling Constructions Private Limited & Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. Central Circle4(3), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 01 May 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Gsp Piling Constructions Private Limited & Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. Central Circle4(3), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
01 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Gsp Piling Constructions Private Limited & Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. Central Circle4(3), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

1.5.2023 ks sl. 6 ks WPA 5110 of 2023 GSP Piling Constructions Private Limited & Anr. VsAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax. Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. R.N. Dutt,Ms. Sutapa Roy Choudhury,Ms. Aratrika Roy … For the Petitioners.Mr. Vipul Kundalia,Mr. Prithu Dudhoria … For the Income Tax Authority. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioners have challengedthe impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 dated 18[th] April, 2022, andsubsequent proceedings and notices under Section143(2) and 142(1) dated 21[st] January, 2023, relating toassessment year 2018-19. During the pendency ofthis writ petition final order under Section 147 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 has already been passed as hasbeen informed by the petitioners in course of hearingof this writ petition, which is an appealable orderbefore the CIT(Appeals). Now the petitioners want thiscourt to allow the petitioners to withdraw this writpetition with liberty to file a fresh writ petitionchallenging the final assessment order under Section147 of the Act, which was passed during the pendencyof this writ petition which is an appealable order andtaking into consideration the availability of alternative remedy, I am not inclined to grant such liberty to filefresh writ petition challenging the Appealable orderunder Section 147 of the Act. However, since the petitioners do not want to pressthis writ petition, the impugned notice under Section148A(b) and 148(d) of the Act this court is not going toadjudicate the same and, accordingly the writ petitionbeing WPA 5110 of 2023 is dismissed as “not pressed”. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan