Hari Vintrade Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1/1 Kolkata And Ors
High Court
31 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Hari Vintrade Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1/1 Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
31 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Hari Vintrade Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1/1 Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: With these observations and directions, this writ petition being WPO748 of 2023 stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER SHEETWPO/748/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
HARI VINTRADE PRIVATE LIMITEDVS
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1/1 KOLKATAAND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 31[st] March, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Anurag Roy, Adv.Mr. Kushagra Shah, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Amit Sharma, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderunder Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31[st] July, 2022,relating to assessment year 2015-16 on the ground that the same is totallynon-speaking order and does not contain any reference and discussion onthe factual and legal issues raised by the petitioner in its objection dated10[th] June, 2022 against the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
On perusal of the aforesaid impugned order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Act, I find that the allegation of the petitioner is substantially correctsince no discussion and findings has been given in the aforesaid impugnedorder on the factual and legal issues raised by the petitioner in its objectiondated 10[th] June, 2022.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of thediscussion made above, the aforesaid impugned order dated 31[st] July, 2022
is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the assessingofficer concerned to pass a fresh speaking and reasoned order in accordancewith law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication ofthis order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or itsauthorised representative.
Till such final order is passed on the aforesaid objection of thepetitioner dated 10[th] June, 2022, there will be no further proceeding in thematter.
With these observations and directions, this writ petition being WPO748 of 2023 stands disposed of.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.