India v. Ashish Agarwal Tn Civil Appeal
High Court
23 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
India v. Ashish Agarwal Tn Civil Appeal
Date of order
23 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In India v. Ashish Agarwal Tn Civil Appeal, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: Tne order at Annexure-H3 is set aside as consequentialrelief of 148A(d) order having been set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitally signed by BKMAHENDRAKUMARLocation: High Courtof Karnataka
-|-
NC: 2023:KHC:21795WP No. 11/790 of 202
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON 'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV'WRIT PETITION NO. 11790 OF 2023 (TIT
BETWEEN:
SRI. AJEETH.S/O. LATE A.P. GIRIVASANAGED 44 YEARSR/AT. NO.100, RAMESH NIVAS|17 CROSS, RAMAMURTHY NAGARBENGALURU - 560 016
PETITIONER
(BY SRI: MV. SHESHACHALA SR, ADV.,SRI: ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) |SRI: ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) |
AND:
1.ASSESSING OFFICERINCOME TAX OFFICER|NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE.NO.412-413, 1 FLOOROPP. METRO PILLAR NO. 7/93DWARKA MOR|NEW DELHI - 110 059.
2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF |INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4(1)(1)BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 O95.
3.0PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-4BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 O95.
. RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
-7-
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 2277OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - QUASH THEASSESSMENTORDER,DATED17.05.2023.BEARINGO.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/10529116/76(1) ANNEXURE-H3 PASSEDBYRESPONDENTNO, 1FORASSESSMENTYEAR|2015-16;CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.07.2022 ANNEXURE-E3 PASSED UNDER SECTION 148A OF THE IT ACI BEARINGNO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044110/62(1).PASSED|BYRESPONDENT NO.2 AS IT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW DECLARED BY.THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT IN ASHISH AGARWAL (SUPRA) AND-EITC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner has sougnt for issuance of writ of certiorari.to quasn the assessment order at Annexure-H3 dated.17.05.2023 and also sought for setting aside of order at.Annexure-E3.
2.|Learned Senior Counsel Shri M V Snesnachala for|tne petitioner submits that Section 148 notice at Annexure-E1dated 26.07.2022 is required to be construed as 148A(bD) noticein terms of the judgment of the Hon bie Apex Court inUnion of
India Vs Ashish Agarwal tn Civil Appeal No.3005 of 2022.
It is submitted that the procedure then to the followed in terms.of the amended provision and the cognate provision under,Section 148 would be that the petitioner is granted opportunity|to file his objections to 148A(b) notice, after which, order under|
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:21795WP No. 11/790 of 202
148A(d) may be passed accepting the explanation of the.petitioner and dropping of the proceedings or passing of the.order otherwise wnile proceeding to issue notice under 148. It.is further submitted that this process though procedural must|be construed as conferring substantive right on the petitioner|assessee since if any grounds are made out in the reply to thenotice under 148A(b) and the assessee is successful in.convincing the authority, the proceedings itself may come to anend.
4 |It is pointed out that notice 148 was dated.26.07.2022 and the order under 148A(d) came to be passed on.the same date itself.It is clear that no opportunity wasgranted to the petitioner to make out reply before passing|148A(d) order. Accordingly, on this sole ground, the order|under 148A(d) at Annexure-E3 is set aside and the matter is.remanded to the stage, post notice at Annexure-E1.
5.|The petitioner to file nis objection to the notice atAnnexure-El and the respondents to proceed further in.accordance witn law. |
All the contentions are kept open.
NC: 2023:KHC:21795WP No. 11/790 of 202
Accordingly, the petition is.disposed off.
Tne order at Annexure-H3 is set aside as consequentialrelief of 148A(d) order having been set aside.
Sd/-|JUDGE|
*pgn/-|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.