Justify Distributors Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
14 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Justify Distributors Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
14 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Justify Distributors Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
14.08.2023.PBSl. No.10.
WPA 17661 of 2023
Justify Distributors Pvt. Ltd. VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward 2(1),kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Suman Bhowmik,Mr. Samrat Das. … For the Petitioner.Mr. Om Narayan Rai.……..for the income tax authority.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for theparties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challengedthe impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, dated 19[th] April, 2023, relatingto the assessment year 2019-20, on the ground thatthe impugned order being non-speaking and is in totalnon-application of mind by recording therein thatpetitioner had not filed any response to therespondent’s letter/notice dated 28[th] March, 2023,while it is on record that by a letter dated 25[th] April,2023 being Annexure P-2 to the writ petition,petitioner has specifically complied the aforesaidnotice of the respondents dated 28[th] March, 2023. On
perusal of the aforesaid impugned order, I find that theallegation of the petitioner is substantially correct thatin spite of filing its objection/response to the notice ofthe respondent dated 28[th] March, 2023, the same hasnot been considered in the impugned order underSection 148A(d) of the Act and that the AssessingOfficer concerned in total non-application of mind hasrecorded that the aforesaid notice dated 28[th] March,2023 was not complied with.
Mr. Rai, learned advocate appearing for therespondent income tax authority could not contradictthe aforesaid allegation of the petitioner which issubstantiated by record.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase as appears from record and submission of theparties, the aforesaid impugned order dated 19[th] April,2023, under Section 148A(d) of the Act andsubsequent proceeding are set aside and the matter isremanded back to the Assessing Officer concerned topass a fresh order after considering the reply of thepetitioner dated 18[th] April, 2023, in accordance withlaw and by giving an opportunity of personal hearingto the petitioner within 8 weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order. At the time of hearing,petitioner shall be entitled to raise all the points in thiswrit petition before the Assessing Officer.
With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA 17661 of 2023 is disposed of.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.