Case LawHigh Court › Kalyani Sarkar v. Income Tax Officer, Wa...

Kalyani Sarkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 09 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Kalyani Sarkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
09 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Kalyani Sarkar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of this fact, I am not inclined to entertainthis writ petition and accordingly this writ petitionbeing WPA 9001 of 2022 is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

9.6.2022 ks sl. 23 ks WPA 9001 of 2022 Kalyani Sarkar Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Promit Majumder … For the Petitioner.Mr. Om Narayan Rai … For the Respondents. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order under Section 148A(d) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 dated 26[th] March, 2022 relating toassessment year 2018-2019 on the ground that thesame has been passed without serving notice underSection 148A(b) of the Act. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondents/Income Tax authorities produces a documentdownloaded from the official portal of the departmentwhich shows that show-cause-notice under Section148A(b) of the Act was issued and served by therespondent before passing the impugned order underSection 148A(d) of the Act. In view of this fact, I am not inclined to entertainthis writ petition and accordingly this writ petitionbeing WPA 9001 of 2022 is dismissed. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan