Kco Aluminium Llp v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
16 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Kco Aluminium Llp v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
16 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Kco Aluminium Llp v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 3836 of 2023 stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
16.03.2023 Sl no. 12 Ct no. 2 P.M.
WPA 3836 OF 2023
KCO Aluminium LLP. - Vs - Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(4), Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder, Ms. Alisha Das, Mr. Suman Bhowmik
… For the Petitioners.
Ms. Smita Das De
… for the respondent.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 29[th] March, 2022, under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to assessment year 2018-2019 on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice by being deprived of opportunity of personal hearing in spite of its request by letter dated 21[st] March, 2022.
Ms. Das De learned advocate representing the respondent Income Tax authority concerned opposes this writ petition by contending that ample opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner to make out any case against the impugned notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act but she could not
produce any document to show that opportunity of personal hearing was given to the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing officer concerned is directed to provide opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and if petitioner is able to satisfy the Assessing Officer for dropping out the impugned reassessment proceeding, in that event the Assessing Officer shall withdraw the aforesaid impugned order and drop the impugned proceeding and if petitioner fails to make out a case for dropping out the impugned proceeding the aforesaid impugned order will become effective. Till any hearing is given and any decision is taken after personal hearing the aforesaid impugned order shall remain stayed.
With this observation and direction this writ petition being WPA 3836 of 2023 stands disposed of.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.