Case LawHigh Court › Loknath Saraf Securities Private Limited...

Loknath Saraf Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) And Ors

High Court 14 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Loknath Saraf Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) And Ors
Date of order
14 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Loknath Saraf Securities Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2) And Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Since the final assessment order under Section 147 of the Act has been passed in this matter which is anappealable order and furthermore I have perused the aforesaid order dated29[th] May, 2023 which has detailed reason and order having elaboratediscussion based on facts and evidence after enquiry a...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ORDER SHEETWPO/1099/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE LOKNATH SARAF SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITEDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2) AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date: 14[th] June, 2023. Appearance:Mr. Rites Goel, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.…For the Respondents The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 27[th] July, 2022, under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961,relating to assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent final assessment orderdated 29[th] May, 2023 by way of a supplementary affidavit which is anappealable order. By this writ petition, petitioner wants this Court to invokeConstitutional Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia at this stage when the notice under Section148A(b) of the Act hadbeen issued, objection to the same was filed, order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Act was passed and thereafter impugned notice under Section 148 of theAct was passed and finally when this matter was taken up it appears fromrecord that the final assessment order itself has been passed which hasbeen impugned by way of supplementary affidavit before this Court andchallenging the same on the ground that that the notice under Section 148of the Act was barred by limitation. Since the final assessment order under Section 147 of the Act has been passed in this matter which is anappealable order and furthermore I have perused the aforesaid order dated29[th] May, 2023 which has detailed reason and order having elaboratediscussion based on facts and evidence after enquiry and investigation I amnot inclined to entertain this writ petition being WPO 1099 of 2023 andaccordingly the same is dismissed. TR/ (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan