Case LawHigh Court › M P Birla Foundation v. Income Tax Offic...

M P Birla Foundation v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4) Exempt Kol And Anr

High Court 22 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M P Birla Foundation v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4) Exempt Kol And Anr
Date of order
22 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M P Birla Foundation v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4) Exempt Kol And Anr, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: With these observations and directions, this writ petition being WPO1212 of 2023 stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDER SHEETWPO/1212/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE M P BIRLA FOUNDATION VS INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4) EXEMPT KOL AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date: 22[nd] June, 2023. Appearance:Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Protyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv.Mr. Mrigank Kejriwal, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Aryak Dutt, Adv.…For the Respondents The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.Affidavit of service filed in Court be kept with the records. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 21[st] April, 2023 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961relating to assessment year 2019-20 on the ground of violation of principlesof natural justice by not considering its objections dated 19[th] April, 2023and 20[th] April, 2023 which were filed belatedly. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and submissionsof the parties and that the petitioner being an educational institution, whichhas filed the objections/representations though belatedly, I am of the viewthat it should have been considered by the assessing officer since the samewas filed at least before passing the aforesaid impugned order. The aforesaidimpugned order dated 21[st] April, 2023 and all subsequent proceedings areset aside and the matter is remanded back to the assessing officer concerned to pass fresh speaking order in accordance with law, aftergiving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or its authorisedrepresentative and by taking into consideration the aforesaid objections ofthe petitioner dated 19[th] April, 2023 and 20[th] April, 2023, within a period ofeight weeks from the date of communication of this order. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merit of theaforesaid objections and the assessing officer shall consider the samestrictly in accordance with law. With these observations and directions, this writ petition being WPO1212 of 2023 stands disposed of. TR/ (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan