Case LawHigh Court › Manoj Kuamr Jha v. Income Tax Commission...

Manoj Kuamr Jha v. Income Tax Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Delhi

High Court 24 May 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Manoj Kuamr Jha v. Income Tax Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Delhi
Date of order
24 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Manoj Kuamr Jha v. Income Tax Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Delhi, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7560/2024 & CM APPL. 31477/2024 (Stay) MANOJ KUAMR JHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Shankar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, SC and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, SC. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALO R D E R% 24.05.2024 CM APPL. 31478/2024 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed. W.P.(C) 7560/2024 & CM APPL. 31477/2024 (Stay) 1.This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a writ, or direction in the nature of Certiorari setting aside the Impugned show cause dated 31.03.2023 issued under section 148A(b), the impugned order dated 17.04.2023 passed under section 148A(d) of the Act and the impugned notice dated 17.04.2023 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and all subsequent & consequent proceedings thereafter, to the petitioner, for the Assessment Year 2016-17, by the respondent; (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition thereby restraining respondent from undertaking further assessment proceedings against the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2016-17 during the pendency of the present petition; (iii) Issue any other writ/order/direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in favour of the Petitioner.” 2.As is ex facie evident, the petitioner impugns an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’] which was passed as far back as on 17 April 2023. In view of the above and the evident laches, we find no ground to entertain the instant writ petition. It shall consequently stand dismissed. 3.This order, however, shall be without prejudice to all rights and contentions of the writ petitioner being kept open to be agitated in the course of reassessment. YASHWANT VARMA, J MAY 24, 2024/RW AMIT BANSAL, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan