Case LawHigh Court › Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi And Mr v. Income T...

Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi And Mr v. Income Tax Department

High Court 01 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi And Mr v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
01 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi And Mr v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8804/2024 & CM APPL. 35821/2024 (Stay) PINKI TOUR AND TRAVELS LTD ..... Petitioner Through Amar Gupta, Advs. Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi and Mr. versus INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC along with Mr. Anant Mann, Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta and Mr. Vikram Chand, JSCs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAO R D E R% 01.07.2024 CM APPL. 35822/2024 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8804/2024 & CM APPL. 35821/2024 (Stay) 1.The writ petitioner impugns the order dated 29 September 2023 referable to Section 148A(d) as well as the final notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’] which came to be issued. 2.The principal grievance, apart from the other challenges which were raised, was with respect to additional information in respect of a sum of INR 91,28,044/- claimed as commission expenses and the proposed variation in respect thereof which came to be communicated to the petitioner on 25 September 2023. 3.According to the writ petitioner, very little time was accorded to the assessee to respond to the notice and proceedings thereafter came to be closed and a final order passed on 29 September 2023 under Section 148A(d) of the Act. 4.The aforesaid aspect is liable to be appreciated additionally in light of the request which had been made on 26 September 2023 by the writ petitioner for being accorded further time to respond to the notice of 25 September 2023. 5.In our considered opinion, the end of justice would merit the assessee being accorded two weeks’ time to furnish all additional information and material that it may choose to rely upon in order to effectively answer the issues which stood raised in terms of the notice of 25 September 2023, since the assessment is yet to be completed. 6.In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition at this stage, while leaving all rights and contentions of respective parties open, by providing that the writ petitioner would have two weeks from today to furnish all material and evidence that it may choose to rely upon while responding to the notice of 25 September 2023. Any such material that may be placed before the Assessing Officer shall be duly taken into consideration. The assessment may be now completed in accordance with law and after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the writ petitioner. YASHWANT VARMA, J. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JULY 01, 2024/RW
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan