Mr Ravi Mittal v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
High Court
09 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr Ravi Mittal v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
Date of order
09 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr Ravi Mittal v. Income Tax Officer & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition shall stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 14903/2022 & CM APPL. 45786/2022 (Interim Direction)
MR RAVI MITTAL
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Easha & Ms. Hemlata Rawat, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
09.02.2024
%
We find from the order of 17 November 2022 that it had been fairly conceded that the only issue which survives was with respect to TDS referable to Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”]. Since that issue is admittedly less than Rs. 50 lakhs, the initiation of proceedings impugned herein would clearly not sustain in light of the judgment rendered by the Court in Ganesh Dass Khanna vs Income-
Tax Officer & Anr. [2023 SCC OnLine Del 7286].
We consequently allow the instant writ petition and quash the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) and notice issued under Section 148 of the Act both dated 26 July 2022 for Assessment Year 2016-17.
The petition shall stand disposed of.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.FEBRUARY 9, 2024/kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.