M/S. Marudhar Suppliers Private Limited v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Range I And Anr
High Court
26 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S. Marudhar Suppliers Private Limited v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Range I And Anr
Date of order
26 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Marudhar Suppliers Private Limited v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Range I And Anr, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am notinclined to interfere with the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theAct and accordingly the writ petition being WPO 1308 of 2023 is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD –4
ORDER SHEETWPO/1308/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
M/S. MARUDHAR SUPPLIERS PRIVATE LIMITEDVS
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE I AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 26[th] July, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Moti Sagar Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Shantanu Mishra, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 30[th] March, 2023 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961relating to assessment year 2019-20 by contending that its objection againstthe notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, dated 11[th] March, 2023 was notconsidered which was filed in the email address of the department.
I have perused the relevant records and particularly the notice underSection 148A(b) of the Act dated 11[th] March, 2023 and in paragraph 3 of thesaid notice it clearly appears as to before whom and which portal petitionerwas to file the reply. Paragraph 3 of the said notice is quoted hereunder :
“3. You may submit your reply to this notice, along with supportingdocuments (if any) on the above mentioned issues on or before 20/03/2023electronically at www.incometax.gov.in.”
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as appears fromrecord I find that the assessing officer concerned has committed no wrongand there is no fault on his part in not considering the objection which wassent by the petitioner in a different address than the address which hasbeen specifically indicated by the assessing officer in paragraph 3 of theaforesaid notice. Furthermore, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) ofthe Act is neither the final assessment order nor any demand arises out ofthe same.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am notinclined to interfere with the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of theAct and accordingly the writ petition being WPO 1308 of 2023 is dismissed.
However, dismissal of the writ petition will not be a bar on the part ofthe assessing officer concerned to consider the objection/reply of thepetitioner dated 11[th] March, 2023, in the proceeding subsequent to thenotice under Section 148 of the Act in accordance with law.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.