Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Winsher Merchants Private Limited &...

M/S. Winsher Merchants Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) & Ors

High Court 23 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
M/S. Winsher Merchants Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) & Ors
Date of order
23 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Winsher Merchants Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: With this observation and direction this writ petition, being WPA 18379 of 2022 stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

23.08.2022 Sl no. 16 Ct no. 2 P.M. WPA 18379 OF 2022 M/s. Winsher Merchants Private Limited & Anr. - Vs - Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) & Ors. Mr. Dhiraj Lakhotia, Ms. Radhika Agarwal … for the petitioners Mr. Om Narayan Rai …. For Union of India Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioners have challenged two impugned orders dated 30[th] July, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 though it appears from record that there was only one notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act issued on 25[th] May, 2022. It is very peculiar circumstances that how two orders under Section 148A(d) on the same day can be passed against the same assessee and further in the interest of justice after taking into consideration that petitioners could not avail the benefit by making any objection against notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, both the aforesaid impugned orders and subsequent notice under Section 148 of the Act are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer concerned to pass a fresh speaking order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or its authorized representative and after taking into consideration the objection, if petitioners file against the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act within seven days from date and such fresh order under Section 148A(d) is to be passed by the respondent Assessing officer within four weeks from the date of receipt of such objection. In case of default in filing any objection by the petitioners against the aforesaid notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act within the time stipulated herein, the Assessing Officer will be free to pass the fresh order without giving further opportunity to the petitioner. With this observation and direction this writ petition, being WPA 18379 of 2022 stands disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan