Nc: 2024:Khc:35077Wp v. Quash The Notice For Penalty Under Section 274 Read With Section 270A Of I.t. Act Dated 30.03.2024 Bearing No. Itba/Pnl/S/270A/2023-24/1063687048(1) Issued By T
High Court
30 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Nc: 2024:Khc:35077Wp v. Quash The Notice For Penalty Under Section 274 Read With Section 270A Of I.t. Act Dated 30.03.2024 Bearing No. Itba/Pnl/S/270A/2023-24/1063687048(1) Issued By T
Date of order
30 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nc: 2024:Khc:35077Wp v. Quash The Notice For Penalty Under Section 274 Read With Section 270A Of I.t. Act Dated 30.03.2024 Bearing No. Itba/Pnl/S/270A/2023-24/1063687048(1) Issued By T, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal under Section 148, Section 148A, Section 270A, Section 272A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: In the result, pass the following: [SECTION] ## ORDER [SECTION] ## (i) Petition is hereby allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedbyLEELAVATHI SRLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 23679 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
MR. N SRINIVASA, SON OF LATE NARAYANA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 296, 16 CROSS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 080.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ALOKE MADAPPA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1 (3), BENGALURU , 3 FLOOR, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1 (3), BENGALURU , 3 FLOOR, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 3 FLOOR, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 3 FLOOR, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL / JOINT/ DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO 401, 2 FLOOR, E - RAMP, JAWARHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI – 110 003. REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL / JOINT/ DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO 401, 2 FLOOR, E - RAMP, JAWARHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI – 110 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M DILIP., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(b) DATED 07.02.2023 BEARING ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049516047(1) ISSUED BY THE R-1 (ANNEXURE-A) AND QUASH THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 148A(d)
DATED 11.03.2023 BEARING ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050637190(1) AND CONSEQUENT, NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 DATED 11.03.2023 ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/1050638619(1) ISSUED BY THE R-1 (ANNEXURE-B AND B1) AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“i. Quash the Notice under Section 148A(b) dated 07.02.2023 bearing ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049516047(1) issued by the 1[st ]Respondent (ANNEXURE-A);
ii. Quash the Order under Section 148A(d) dated 11.03.2023 bearing ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050637190(1) and consequent, Notice under Section 148 dated 11.03.2023 ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/1050638619(1) issued by the 1[st]Respondent (ANNEXURE-B and B1) and etc.,
iii. Quash the Show Cause Notice dated 24.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/AST/F/147(SCN)/2023-24/1063312067(1) issued by the 1[st] Respondent (ANNEXURE-C).
iv. Quash the Ex-parte Assessment Order dated 30.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1063686939(1) along with Computation Sheet dated 30.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/AST/S/319/2023-24/1063687044(1) and the Demand Notice dated 30.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1063687070(1) issued by the 1[st] Respondent (ANNEXURE-D, D1 and D2).
v. Quash the Notice for Penalty under Section 274 read with Section 270A of I.T. Act dated 30.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1063687048(1) issued by the 1[st]Respondent (ANNEXURE-E).
vi. Quash the Notice for Penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) of I.T. Act dated 19.07.2024 bearing No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1066837415(1) issued by the 1[st] Respondent (ANNEXURE-F).
vii. Pass such other or further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, and in the interests of justice and equity.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
v. Quash the Notice for Penalty under Section 274 read with Section 270A of I.T. Act dated 30.03.2024 bearing No. ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1063687048(1) issued by the 1[st]Respondent (ANNEXURE-E).
vi. Quash the Notice for Penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) of I.T. Act dated 19.07.2024 bearing No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1066837415(1) issued by the 1[st] Respondent (ANNEXURE-F).
vii. Pass such other or further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, and in the interests of justice and equity.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘I.T Act’), dated 07.02.2023 was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notice and consequently, the petitioner could not submit his reply / response along with documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notice was due to
bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
3.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had challenged the final assessment order at Annexure-D dated 30.03.2024 by way of filing an appeal, if this Court were to set aside the impugned assessment order at Annexure-B dated 11.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the I.T.Act and all further notices, etc., the petitioner would unconditionally withdraw the appeal filed by him before the Appellate authority.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents-revenue submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that the petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of
the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure – B dated 11.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the I.T Act and subsequent notices / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to the 1[st] respondent for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section 148A(b) notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
6. Further, the submission made on behalf of the petitioner
that he would unconditionally withdraw the appeal filed by him which is pending before the Appellate authority as expeditiously as possible is placed on record.
7. In the result, pass the following:
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned order at Annexure-B dated 11.03.2023; impugned notice at Annexure-B1 dated 11.03.2023; the impugned
show cause notice at Annexure-C dated 24.03.2024; impugned Ex-parte assessment order at Annexure-D dated 30.03.2024; impugned computation sheet at Annexure-D1; impugned Demand notice at Annexure-D2 dated 30.03.2024; impugned penalty notice at Annexure-E dated 30.03.2024 and impugned penalty notice at Annexure-F dated 19.07.2024. are hereby set aside.
6. Further, the submission made on behalf of the petitioner
that he would unconditionally withdraw the appeal filed by him which is pending before the Appellate authority as expeditiously as possible is placed on record.
7. In the result, pass the following:
ORDER
(i) Petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned order at Annexure-B dated 11.03.2023; impugned notice at Annexure-B1 dated 11.03.2023; the impugned
show cause notice at Annexure-C dated 24.03.2024; impugned Ex-parte assessment order at Annexure-D dated 30.03.2024; impugned computation sheet at Annexure-D1; impugned Demand notice at Annexure-D2 dated 30.03.2024; impugned penalty notice at Annexure-E dated 30.03.2024 and impugned penalty notice at Annexure-F dated 19.07.2024. are hereby set aside.
(iii) The matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting reply to the Show Cause Notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the I.T Act at Annexure – A dated 07.02.2023.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the 1[st] respondent, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
Srl.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.