Case LawHigh Court › N.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer, W...

N.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 09 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
N.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
09 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In N.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.29772 of 2022 & WMP.Nos.29165 & 29166 of 2022 N.Rajagopal,9, Gandhi Road,Kallakuruchi-602202 ...Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, 1, Chairman Subbarayar Street, West Shanmugapuram, Villupuram-605602 ...Respondent Prayer:Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of certiorari calling for the records on the files of the respondent and quash impugned order passed by the respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) in PAN: , DIN-ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044347793(1) dated 30.07.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18, the impugned notice no.1 issued by the respondent under Section 148 of the Act in PAN: , DIN:ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033936450(1) dated 30.06.2021 for the assessment year 2017-18, the impugned notice no.2 with reference to Section 148A(b) of the Act issued by the respondent in PAN: , DIN-ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043293093(1) dated 01.06.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18 and the impugned notice no.3 under Section 148 of the Act issued by the respondent in PAN: dated 30.07.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18, having DIN:ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1044355245(1), communicated vide intimation letter dated 30.07.2022 in DIN: ITBA/AST/S/91/2022-23/1044355343(1). For Petitioner For Respondents DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J. : Mr.R.Saravanan for Mr.N.V.Balaji : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondent and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter. 2. After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would seek liberty of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and proceed with the matter before the Authority, in accordance with law. He has made an endorsement to this effect. 3. Recording the aforesaid, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty, as sought for, is granted to the petitioner. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09.11.2022 skaIndex : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non speaking Order ToThe Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, 1, Chairman Subbarayar Street, West Shanmugapuram, Villupuram-605602 W.P.No.29772 of 2022 &WMP.Nos.29165 & 29166 of 2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan