Nuovo Pignone International Srl v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2-2- 2, International Taxation & Ors
High Court
16 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Nuovo Pignone International Srl v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2-2- 2, International Taxation & Ors
Date of order
16 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nuovo Pignone International Srl v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2-2- 2, International Taxation & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12625/2022
NUOVO PIGNONE INTERNATIONAL SRL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sachit Jolly, Mr.Rishabh Malhotra, Ms.Soumya Singh and Mr.Devansh Jain, Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2-2- 2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr.Shivansh B.Pandya, Jr.SC and Mr.Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv for I.T.Dept.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R16.04.2024
1.The instant writ petition has impugned the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ["Act"]. While various contentions were canvassed before us, we find from the record that undisputedly a Form-5 with respect to Assessment Year ["AY"] 2014-2015 in terms of the provisions contained in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 ["VSV Act"] has come to be issued in favour of the petitioner. The said Form-5 dated 27 May 2021 has been placed on our record collectively as Annexure P-10.
2.In view of the aforesaid and bearing in mind Section 5(3) of the
VSV Act, the reassessment proceedings cannot possibly be sustained. 3.We accordingly and in light of the statutory position noted hereinabove, quash the impugned notices dated 30 May 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act and 28 July 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act and impugned order dated 28 July 2022 issued under Section 148A(d) of the Act for the AY 2014-2015.
4. We also take on board the request of Mr. Sunil Agarwal, learned counsel, who submits that in the order dated 26 February 2024, his appearance is inadvertently marked as Mr. Vipul Agarwal, Advocate. Accordingly, the appearance of Mr. Sunil Agarwal be read in the aforesaid order as counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents/Revenue.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
APRIL 16, 2024/MJ
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.